The Ascendance of Wood: Mass Engineered Timber and Singapore’s Green Building Revolution

 

 

1. Introduction: Singapore’s Green Imperative and the Timber Dawn

 

 

Setting the Stage: Singapore’s Unwavering Commitment to Sustainability

 

Singapore has established a robust national sustainability agenda, underscored by the Singapore Green Plan 2030.¹ This ambitious roadmap outlines concrete targets across various sectors, demonstrating a deep-seated national commitment to fostering sustainable development. A critical component of this plan is the focus on “Greener Infrastructure and Buildings,” which includes a target to green 80% of Singapore’s buildings by Gross Floor Area (GFA) by the year 2030.² This national vision necessitates a paradigm shift in how buildings are designed, constructed, and operated, creating a fertile ground for innovative and sustainable solutions. The Green Plan is not merely a policy document but a collective national endeavor, reflecting a broad consensus on the importance of environmental stewardship.¹Central to achieving these goals within the built environment is the Singapore Green Building Masterplan (SGBMP).¹ This masterplan sets forth the “80-80-80 in 2030” targets, which are pivotal for the construction industry:

• Greening 80% of buildings by GFA by 2030.
• Ensuring that 80% of new developments (by GFA) are Super Low Energy (SLE) buildings from 2030 onwards.
• Achieving an 80% improvement in energy efficiency for best-in-class green buildings by 2030, compared to 2005 levels. These targets, as detailed in official documents ⁴, clearly articulate the need for high-performance and sustainable construction methodologies and materials. Progress has been made, with 43% of Singapore’s buildings (by GFA) having achieved green certification by the end of 2020.¹ However, this figure also highlights the significant effort required to meet the 2030 ambitions, thereby underscoring the critical role that innovative materials like Mass Engineered Timber (MET) are expected to play. The SGBMP’s policy framework, therefore, acts as a significant demand driver for such advanced solutions.

 

The Carbon Challenge in the Built Environment

 

The global construction industry and the operational lifespan of buildings are substantial contributors to greenhouse gas emissions. In Singapore, the built environment accounts for over 20% of the nation’s carbon emissions.¹⁰ These emissions stem from two primary sources: operational carbon, which is the energy consumed for heating, cooling, lighting, and powering appliances within buildings; and embodied carbon, which encompasses all emissions associated with the extraction, manufacturing, transportation of building materials, and the construction process itself.The production of conventional building materials, particularly Portland cement used in concrete, is a major source of industrial CO2 emissions. Similarly, steel manufacturing is an energy-intensive process with a significant carbon footprint. Given Singapore’s commitment to its climate targets under international agreements like the Paris Agreement, the decarbonization of the construction sector is not merely desirable but essential. Mass Engineered Timber presents a compelling alternative, offering a considerably lower carbon footprint compared to these traditional materials. For instance, one comparative study indicated a 19% reduction in emissions for a mass timber structure when benchmarked against an equally sized steel structure.¹¹ This inherent environmental advantage positions MET as a key enabler in mitigating the carbon impact of

Singapore Construction and advancing the Green Building agenda.

 

Introducing Mass Engineered Timber (MET): A Pivotal Solution for Singapore Construction

 

Mass Engineered Timber (MET) is rapidly emerging as a transformative and sustainable construction material. It represents a significant advancement from traditional timber use, comprising engineered wood products specifically designed and manufactured for enhanced structural integrity, predictability, and performance in large-scale building applications.

MET is uniquely positioned to address two of Singapore’s pressing challenges in the built environment sector: the need for increased productivity and the urgent imperative for greater sustainability. Its characteristics align seamlessly with the strategic thrusts of Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA), green buildings, and Integrated Digital Delivery (IDD), as identified in Singapore’s Construction Industry Transformation Map (ITM).¹² The adoption of MET allows for a significant portion of construction work to be moved off-site into controlled factory environments, leading to faster assembly, improved quality, and safer worksites.This report posits that Mass Engineered Timber is set to play an increasingly critical role in Singapore’s ambitious journey towards a greener, more sustainable, and highly productive built environment. It is a material that not only meets the technical demands of modern construction but also resonates with the global call for environmentally responsible building practices, making it a cornerstone of the ongoing Green Building revolution in Singapore Construction. The early adoption phase of MET in Singapore, while presenting a learning curve, also signals a significant opportunity for the nation to lead in sustainable construction innovation within the tropical urban context.¹² The success of pioneering MET projects is crucial for demonstrating its viability and encouraging broader market acceptance, thereby accelerating this timber dawn.

 

2. Deconstructing Mass Engineered Timber: The Science and Substance

 

 

Defining Mass Engineered Timber (MET): Beyond Traditional Wood

 

Mass Engineered Timber (MET) represents a significant evolution in the use of wood as a construction material. It encompasses a range of engineered wood products specifically designed and manufactured to achieve enhanced structural integrity, dimensional stability, and predictable performance characteristics, making them suitable for demanding and large-scale structural applications.¹² Unlike conventional timber framing, which typically utilizes solid sawn lumber, MET products are created by bonding together layers of wood veneers, strands, or lumber under controlled factory conditions. This engineering process effectively overcomes many of the natural limitations of solid wood, such as variability in strength due to knots and grain, and restrictions on achievable sizes and spans. The term “engineered” is critical, signifying that these are not raw timber products but sophisticated materials whose properties are well understood and can be reliably predicted for design purposes. As stated by the Building and Construction Authority (BCA), MET refers to “engineered wood products with improved structural integrity” ¹², a definition echoed in other industry guidance.¹³

 

Spotlight on Key MET Types: Applications in Singapore Construction

 

While several types of MET exist, Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT) and Glue-Laminated Timber (Glulam) are the most prominent and widely adopted in Singapore Construction and globally.

 

Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT)

 

• Definition & Manufacturing: CLT is a large-scale, prefabricated, solid engineered wood panel. It is manufactured by stacking multiple layers (typically three, five, or seven, though more are possible) of kiln-dried timber boards, known as lamellas or lamstock, at 90-degree angles to the adjacent layers.¹² These layers are then bonded together with high-strength, structural-grade adhesives under significant pressure to form a solid, monolithic panel. This cross-lamination is the defining characteristic of CLT and is fundamental to its structural properties.
• Properties: The orthogonal arrangement of layers gives CLT panels exceptional dimensional stability and high in-plane and out-of-plane strength and stiffness, making them resistant to warping and shrinking.¹² This bi-directional strength allows CLT to function effectively as both vertical (wall) and horizontal (floor/roof) elements. CLT also exhibits good fire performance; when exposed to fire, the outer layer chars at a slow and predictable rate, forming an insulating layer that protects the inner, unburnt wood and maintains structural integrity for a specified period. Furthermore, the manufacturing process, often incorporating Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machining, allows for high precision in cutting panels to size and creating openings for doors, windows, and service conduits, offering considerable design flexibility.¹²
• Common Applications: Due to its panelized nature and structural capabilities, CLT is widely used for load-bearing wall panels, floor slabs, roof structures, and shear walls in a variety of building types, including residential, commercial, and institutional projects.¹² Its suitability for prefabrication makes it ideal for rapid on-site assembly, contributing to shorter construction timelines.

 

Glue-Laminated Timber (Glulam/GLT)

 

• Definition & Manufacturing: Glulam is an engineered wood product created by bonding together multiple layers of high-strength timber laminations (lamellas) with their grain running parallel to the length of the member.¹³ These laminations are joined using durable, moisture-resistant structural adhesives under controlled conditions of temperature and pressure.
• Properties: Glulam members offer excellent strength-to-weight ratios, often exceeding those of solid timber of comparable dimensions. The lamination process allows for the dispersal of natural wood defects (like knots) throughout the member, leading to a more homogenous and predictable structural material with higher allowable design stresses. Glulam can be manufactured in a wide range of sizes and shapes, including large and long-span straight beams, as well as complex curved or arched forms, offering significant architectural versatility.
• Common Applications: Glulam is primarily used for load-bearing structural frames, including columns, beams, purlins, girders, and trusses.¹³ Its aesthetic appeal often leads to its specification in applications where the structural elements are left exposed, contributing to the visual character of the building. An example of its application in Singapore is the Woh Hup Technical Hub, where Glulam was used for columns (400mm x 560mm), main beams (400mm x 720mm), and secondary beams (200mm x 600mm).¹⁸

 

Other MET types

 

While CLT and Glulam are dominant, other MET products like Nail-Laminated Timber (NLT) also exist. NLT is formed by fastening individual lumber pieces (typically 2x4s, 2x6s, etc.) placed on edge, with nails or screws to create larger panels. It is a more traditional form of mass timber and can be a cost-effective choice for floors, walls, and roofs, offering unique textured appearances and customizable forms.¹¹

 

The Journey of MET: From Sustainable Forests to Precision-Engineered Components

 

The production and use of MET involve a carefully managed supply chain that emphasizes sustainability and precision.

• Sustainable Sourcing: A cornerstone of MET’s environmental credentials is the sourcing of timber from sustainably managed forests. This typically involves certification by internationally recognized schemes such as the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) or the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC).¹¹ These certifications provide assurance that the timber is harvested responsibly, with due consideration for biodiversity, ecosystem health, indigenous peoples’ rights, and long-term forest regeneration through replanting programs.¹¹ Projects like the JTC PDD MET building specifically utilized timber from such certified sustainable sources ¹⁹, reinforcing the industry’s commitment to responsible procurement. This sustainable sourcing is a core component of MET’s value proposition, differentiating it from materials with more extractive origins and aligning it with the growing global demand for transparent and ethical supply chains.
• Precision Manufacturing: MET components are predominantly prefabricated off-site in specialized factory environments. This manufacturing process leverages advanced technologies, most notably Computer Numerical Control (CNC) machining, which allows for components to be cut, drilled, and shaped to extremely precise project specifications.¹² This level of precision is critical for ensuring accurate fits during on-site assembly, minimizing on-site modifications, and achieving high-quality building envelopes. The controlled factory setting also allows for optimal conditions for adhesive curing and quality checks throughout the production process. This precision engineering is a key enabler for architectural innovation, allowing for the creation of complex geometries that might be challenging or cost-prohibitive with traditional on-site construction methods.¹¹
• Quality Control: The production of MET is subject to stringent quality control measures at every stage. This begins with the careful selection and grading of raw timber to ensure it meets the required structural properties. Throughout the lamination, gluing, and pressing processes, parameters such as moisture content, adhesive spread, and curing conditions are closely monitored. The resulting engineered wood products offer a higher degree of consistency and predictability in their structural performance compared to natural solid wood.¹² This adherence to quality standards is crucial for gaining the trust of engineers, regulators, and developers, particularly in a market like Singapore that places a high premium on building safety and quality.

The “engineered” nature of MET is, therefore, fundamental. It signifies a transformation of wood into a high-performance construction material with reliable and verifiable properties, essential for modern structural design and compliance with rigorous building codes.¹³ This engineered predictability, coupled with sustainable sourcing and precision manufacturing, underpins MET’s growing role in the

Green Building movement.

Table 1: Comparative Overview of Key MET Products (CLT and Glulam)

Characteristic	Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT)	Glue-Laminated Timber (Glulam/GLT)
Definition	Layers of timber lamellas stacked cross-wise (perpendicularly) and bonded with structural adhesives.12	Timber lamellas glued with grain aligned in the same direction.14
Lamination	Orthogonal (cross-wise) lamination of layers.12	Parallel lamination of layers.15
Primary Grain Direction	Strength and stability in two planar directions (bi-directional).12	Strength primarily along the length of the member (uni-directional).
Typical Applications	Walls, floors, roofs, shear walls, floor separation.12	Load-bearing frames, columns, beams, trusses, arches.13
Key Structural Properties	High in-plane and out-of-plane strength and stiffness, dimensional stability, good fire resistance (charring).12	High strength-to-weight ratio, ability to form long spans and complex curved shapes, predictable performance.21
Design Flexibility	High, due to CNC machining for custom shapes and openings; large panel sizes possible.12	High, capable of being manufactured into straight, tapered, or curved members of varying cross-sections and lengths.11
Common Sizes/Spans (Indicative)	Panels can be very large (e.g., up to 3m wide and 16m long, or more, depending on manufacturer and transport). Thickness varies based on layers.	Beam depths and lengths can be substantial, tailored to specific structural requirements.

 

3. The Compelling Advantages of Building with Mass Engineered Timber

 

The adoption of Mass Engineered Timber in Singapore Construction is driven by a compelling array of benefits that span environmental sustainability, construction productivity, building performance, and occupant well-being. These advantages position MET as a superior alternative to many conventional building materials, particularly in the context of Singapore’s Green Building aspirations.

 

Environmental Gains: A Greener Footprint for Singapore Construction

 

MET offers profound environmental benefits, primarily centered around its unique relationship with carbon and its renewable nature.

• Carbon Sequestration: Trees, the primary constituent of MET, absorb carbon dioxide (CO2​) from the atmosphere during their growth phase through photosynthesis and store it as carbon within their woody biomass. When this timber is harvested and manufactured into MET products, this sequestered carbon remains locked within the building elements for the entire lifespan of the structure.¹¹ This inherent ability to store carbon distinguishes MET from most other construction materials, which typically have a net positive carbon emission associated with their production.
• Reduced Embodied Carbon: The production of MET is significantly less energy-intensive compared to the manufacturing of conventional materials like steel and concrete. This results in a substantially lower embodied carbon footprint – the total greenhouse gas emissions associated with material extraction, manufacturing, transportation, and construction.¹¹ For example, the JTC Punggol Digital District MET building achieved an astonishing 98% lower embodied carbon footprint than the BCA Green Mark 2021 reference value for non-residential buildings.¹⁹ Another international example, the 25 King building in Australia, demonstrated a 38.7% reduction in embodied carbon (excluding the benefit of sequestered carbon) compared to an equivalent conventional reinforced concrete building.²⁰
• Sustainable Sourcing and Renewability: MET is typically manufactured from timber sourced from sustainably managed forests. These forests operate on principles of responsible harvesting, where trees are replanted to ensure a continuous and renewable supply of raw material.¹¹ The use of certifications like the Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) and the Programme for the Endorsement of Forest Certification (PEFC) provides third-party verification of these sustainable forestry practices, ensuring ecological balance, biodiversity protection, and respect for social and indigenous rights.²² This renewability contrasts sharply with the finite nature of raw materials used for concrete and steel.
• Reduced Resource Extraction: The production of MET avoids the extensive mining and quarrying operations required for the raw materials of concrete (limestone, aggregates) and steel (iron ore). This reduces the environmental disruption associated with resource extraction and lessens the reliance on fossil fuels often consumed in these processes.¹¹
• Biodegradability and Repurposability: At the end of a building’s life, MET components offer more sustainable disposal options. Timber is inherently biodegradable. Furthermore, MET elements, due to their panelized or linear nature and often bolted connections, can be designed for disassembly and repurposing in new structures or for other applications, contributing to a circular economy in the construction sector.¹¹
• Water Efficiency in Production: The manufacturing processes for MET generally consume significantly less water compared to the production of concrete and steel.¹¹ In a water-scarce nation like Singapore, this is an important, albeit less frequently highlighted, environmental advantage.

These environmental attributes make MET a powerful tool in the fight against climate change, directly contributing to the reduction of the construction industry’s carbon footprint. The ability of MET not only to reduce emissions during its production but also to actively store carbon offers a unique dual benefit, making it highly attractive for achieving deep decarbonization in the built environment.

 

Productivity Powerhouse: MET’s Synergy with Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA)

 

Beyond its environmental credentials, MET is a significant driver of construction productivity, largely due to its intrinsic alignment with Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA) principles. DfMA is a key pillar of Singapore’s Construction Industry Transformation Map (ITM), aiming to shift construction activities from traditional on-site methods to off-site prefabrication in controlled factory environments.¹² MET is an exemplary DfMA technology.¹²

• Faster Construction Timelines: The off-site prefabrication of MET components to precise specifications allows for rapid assembly on-site. This significantly shortens overall project durations compared to conventional construction methods.¹¹ Reports from builders indicate construction time can be sped up by 20-30%.²⁹ For instance, the Woh Hup Technical Hub’s MET structure in Singapore was completed in less than six weeks ¹⁸, and NTU’s MET building was also noted for its quicker, less labor-intensive construction.³⁰
• Reduced Labor Requirements: With much of the complex fabrication work completed off-site, the number of workers required on the construction site is substantially reduced.¹¹ Some estimates suggest MET can halve the on-site workforce.¹¹ The Woh Hup Technical Hub achieved an efficient MET installation rate of 7.1 m2/man-day ¹⁸, and JTC’s PDD MET building saw a 60% reduction in on-site manpower.¹⁹ This is particularly beneficial in labor-constrained markets like Singapore.
• Enhanced Site Safety: Prefabrication in a controlled factory environment and reduced on-site activities lead to inherently safer construction sites. There is less need for extensive on-site material processing, fewer workers operating at height for prolonged periods, and reduced clutter.¹¹ The lighter weight of MET components compared to concrete also means simpler and potentially safer lifting operations.
• Minimized Waste: Precision manufacturing in factories significantly reduces material wastage compared to on-site cutting and fitting of conventional materials.¹¹ Sawmill residues can often be utilized in the production of engineered wood products, further minimizing waste.¹¹ The Boola Katitjin project, for example, diverted 93% of its construction and demolition waste from landfill ²⁰, and some reports suggest up to 90% less waste during the structural stage with MET.²⁶
• Improved Quality Control: Manufacturing MET components in a factory setting allows for stringent quality control processes, leading to higher precision, consistent quality, and better finishes compared to on-site construction which can be subject to weather and site variability.¹²

The synergy between MET and DfMA is a critical factor in its growing adoption. For Singapore, which is actively pushing for a more productive and efficient construction sector, MET offers a proven pathway to achieving these goals. The holistic value proposition of MET, combining environmental benefits with tangible improvements in construction speed, safety, and quality, makes it an increasingly attractive option for developers and contractors.

 

Superior Building Performance

 

MET structures exhibit excellent performance characteristics, often rivaling or surpassing traditional materials in key aspects.

• Structural Capabilities: MET products possess high strength-to-weight ratios. Glulam, for instance, can compete with steel in terms of its strength relative to its weight ²¹, while CLT offers excellent bi-directional strength.¹² The lighter weight of MET structures compared to equivalent concrete or steel structures reduces the load on foundations, potentially leading to smaller and less costly foundation systems.²⁰ This is particularly advantageous for sites with poor soil conditions or for adding storeys to existing buildings.
• Fire Resistance: A common misconception about timber is its perceived vulnerability to fire. However, large-section MET elements exhibit predictable and robust fire resistance. When exposed to fire, the outer layer of the timber chars at a known rate, forming an insulating layer that protects the unburnt wood core.¹¹ This char layer slows down the spread of fire and helps the structural element maintain its load-bearing capacity for a specified duration, allowing time for evacuation and firefighting. MET buildings in Singapore must comply with stringent fire safety codes set by the SCDF ¹³, which often involve measures like sprinkler systems and specific detailing for fire protection. NTU Gaia, for example, incorporates an additional sacrificial layer of wood on beams for enhanced fire protection.³⁵
• Thermal Performance: Wood is a natural insulator, and MET structures inherently possess good thermal performance characteristics.²¹ This can contribute to reduced heat gain in hot climates like Singapore’s and lower heat loss in cooler climates, leading to improved building energy efficiency and reduced reliance on artificial heating and cooling systems. NTU’s The Wave sports hall, for example, is reported to provide five times better heat insulation than concrete.³³
• Acoustic Performance: Mass timber can provide effective sound insulation and absorption, contributing to quieter and more comfortable indoor environments.¹¹ The cellular structure of wood and the mass of MET elements help to dampen sound transmission. For instance, the Woh Hup Technical Hub incorporated an acoustic mat on its CLT floor slabs to achieve an acoustic rating of STC 44.¹⁸

 

Human-Centric Benefits: Designing for Well-being

 

Beyond the technical and environmental advantages, MET offers significant benefits for the health and well-being of building occupants.

• Biophilic Design: The use of exposed timber in buildings creates a strong connection to nature, a concept known as biophilia. Numerous studies have shown that exposure to natural elements like wood can reduce stress, improve cognitive function, enhance mood, and increase overall well-being and productivity in occupants.¹¹ The warmth, texture, and visual appeal of wood contribute to creating more inviting and humane interior spaces.
• Improved Indoor Air Quality: Wood is a natural, non-toxic material. Unlike some synthetic building materials, it generally does not off-gas harmful volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that can compromise indoor air quality.¹¹ When finished with low-VOC coatings, MET can contribute to a healthier indoor environment.

The combination of these advantages – environmental stewardship, enhanced productivity, superior building performance, and improved occupant well-being – makes Mass Engineered Timber a truly compelling material for the future of Singapore Construction. Its ability to address multiple strategic objectives simultaneously is a key reason for its rising prominence in the Green Building revolution.

 

4. MET Takes Root in Singapore: Policy, Progress, and Potential

 

The increasing adoption of Mass Engineered Timber (MET) in Singapore is not an isolated phenomenon but is strongly supported and driven by national strategic frameworks, proactive government agency initiatives, and evolving regulatory standards. This supportive ecosystem is crucial for MET to transition from a niche material to a mainstream solution in Singapore Construction.

 

Aligning with National Agendas: MET’s Role in Strategic Frameworks

 

MET’s attributes align closely with Singapore’s overarching national goals for sustainability and industry transformation.

• Singapore Green Building Masterplan (SGBMP): MET is a direct contributor to achieving the SGBMP’s ambitious “80-80-80 in 2030” targets.¹ Its significantly lower embodied carbon compared to conventional materials like concrete and steel ¹¹, coupled with its nature as a renewable resource when sourced sustainably ¹¹, directly supports the goals of greening 80% of Singapore’s building stock and achieving an 80% improvement in energy efficiency for best-in-class green buildings (which implicitly includes reducing embodied energy). The use of MET helps reduce the overall carbon footprint of new developments, pushing them towards Super Low Energy (SLE) and even Zero Energy standards.
• Construction Industry Transformation Map (ITM): The ITM identifies Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA), green buildings, and Integrated Digital Delivery (IDD) as key strategic areas to transform Singapore’s built environment sector.¹² MET construction inherently embodies all three:
  • DfMA: MET components are prefabricated off-site with high precision and assembled on-site, a core tenet of DfMA that enhances productivity and quality.¹²
  • Green Buildings: As extensively discussed, MET is a sustainable material with a lower environmental impact.¹²
  • IDD: The precision required for MET prefabrication and assembly is best facilitated by digital tools like Building Information Modelling (BIM) from design through to manufacturing and construction, aligning with the IDD thrust.¹²

This strong alignment with national strategic priorities provides a powerful impetus for the wider adoption of MET in Singapore Construction.

 

The Building and Construction Authority (BCA) as a Catalyst for MET Adoption

 

The Building and Construction Authority (BCA) has played a pivotal role in fostering an environment conducive to MET adoption through various initiatives.

• BCA Green Mark Scheme: Singapore’s flagship Green Building rating system, the BCA Green Mark Scheme, has evolved to recognize and incentivize the use of sustainable materials like MET.
  • Projects can earn points under criteria related to sustainable construction, the use of certified wood from sustainable sources, reduced embodied carbon, and productivity gains through DfMA methods like MET. ⁵⁶ specifically notes a BCA incentive scheme that encourages the use of mass timber to reduce embodied carbon.
  • The latest iteration, Green Mark: 2021, places even greater emphasis on Whole Life Carbon (WLC)³⁸ This holistic assessment, which considers carbon emissions over a building’s entire lifecycle (including material production, construction, operation, and end-of-life), inherently benefits materials like MET due to their low embodied carbon and carbon sequestration properties.
• MET Guidebook and Technical Standards: Recognizing the need for industry guidance, BCA spearheaded the development of the “Mass Engineered Timber (MET) Guidebook”.¹² This comprehensive document, created in collaboration with industry professionals and technical agencies, provides practitioners with best practices for MET construction in Singapore, covering design considerations, technical coordination, and project delivery. Furthermore, BCA promotes the use of recognized international standards, such as Eurocode 5 (SS EN 1995) for the structural design of timber structures, providing a clear and accepted engineering framework.¹³ This proactive development of guidelines and adoption of standards is crucial for building industry confidence and ensuring the safe and effective use of MET.
• Research & Development (R&D) Support: BCA actively supports innovation in green building technologies. Initiatives like the Green Buildings Innovation Cluster (GBIC) program aim to accelerate the development and deployment of promising energy-efficient technologies.¹ While GBIC has a broad focus, its support for “needle-moving technologies with deep energy efficiency” ⁴⁵ can extend to advancements related to MET that enhance building performance. Moreover, the Singapore government has demonstrated a commitment to funding R&D in sustainable construction materials, with SGD 50 million allocated for this purpose, explicitly supporting innovative materials such as recycled concrete aggregates and Cross-Laminated Timber (CLT).⁵¹

 

Navigating Fire Safety: Singapore’s Codes and Standards for Timber Structures

 

Fire safety is a paramount concern in any construction, and particularly for timber buildings. Singapore has established clear regulatory frameworks to address this.

• MET buildings must comply with the fire safety requirements stipulated by the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) in the prevailing Fire Code.¹³ This ensures that timber structures meet the same safety objectives as buildings made from other materials.
• Specific requirements for MET construction are detailed in the Fire Code, for example, in Section 9.9.5 of an earlier version.²⁵ These typically include the mandatory installation of automatic sprinkler systems. For taller MET buildings (e.g., above 12m for non-healthcare), a Performance-Based (PB) fire safety engineering approach may be required, carried out by a qualified Fire Safety Engineer (FSE). External facades may need to be non-combustible, or if MET is exposed externally, a deluge system or equivalent protection might be necessary.²⁵
• The Fire Safety (Fire Certificate) (Designated Buildings) Order 2016 further clarifies requirements for “engineered timber buildings,” defining them and stipulating conditions under which they require a Fire Certificate, often linked to the presence of automatic fire detection or suppression systems.³⁷
• The inherent fire resistance of MET, due to its mass and predictable charring rate which protects the structural core, is a key factor in its safe design.¹¹ Additionally, standards like SS 572 (Code of Practice for the Use of Timber in Buildings) provide further guidance on timber construction practices.³⁶

This robust regulatory framework, combining prescriptive requirements with options for performance-based design, allows for the safe implementation of MET in Singapore’s urban environment.

 

Quantifying Sustainability: Whole Life Carbon and Embodied Carbon Calculation for MET

 

A significant shift in Singapore’s Green Building assessment is the increasing emphasis on a data-driven, holistic approach to sustainability, particularly concerning carbon emissions.

• The BCA Green Mark: 2021 scheme places a strong focus on Whole Life Carbon (WLC) This involves evaluating the total carbon footprint of a building throughout its entire lifecycle, from material extraction and manufacturing (A1-A3), construction (A4-A5), use (B1-B7), and end-of-life (C1-C4), to beyond the lifecycle (D).⁴³
• To facilitate this, the Singapore Building Carbon Calculator (SBCC), formerly known as the Building Embodied Carbon Calculator (BECC), has been developed. This tool, a collaborative effort by NUS-Energy Studies Institute, JTC, BCA, and the Singapore Green Building Council (SGBC), provides a unified platform for assessing the upfront embodied carbon of building materials, customized for the local Singaporean context. The calculator uses adapted carbon emission factors and considers Environmental Product Declarations (EPDs) from various program operators.⁴⁴
• MET’s inherent properties – low embodied energy in production and its unique ability to sequester atmospheric carbon during tree growth – are favorably assessed under such WLC frameworks. The use of EPDs, which provide standardized and verified environmental data for building products, is crucial for accurately quantifying these benefits.

This move towards data-driven sustainability assessments, as exemplified by the GM:2021 WLC criteria and the SBCC tool, allows for a more objective and comprehensive comparison of different building materials and designs. It reinforces the environmental advantages of MET, providing quantifiable evidence of its contribution to reducing the carbon footprint of Singapore Construction. The integrated approach of the Construction ITM, which links DfMA, green buildings, and IDD ¹², further amplifies MET’s benefits, as its adoption often drives advancements in these interconnected areas, leading to a more holistic transformation of the industry.

Table 2: MET’s Alignment with Singapore’s Green Building Masterplan (SGBMP) & BCA Green Mark Scheme

SGBMP Target / Green Mark Criterion	How MET Contributes	Relevant BCA Initiatives/Tools
SGBMP: 80% of new developments to be Super Low Energy (SLE) by 2030 4	MET’s lower embodied carbon reduces the overall energy footprint. Lighter structures can reduce material usage. Good thermal properties can contribute to operational energy savings.11	Green Mark SLE Certification 4, GBIC Programme for innovative energy-efficient technologies.4
SGBMP: 80% improvement in Energy Efficiency for best-in-class green buildings by 2030 4	Contributes through reduced embodied energy of materials. Potential for better thermal insulation compared to some conventional materials, reducing cooling loads.11	Green Mark Platinum Certification 4, SLEB Smart Hub for green tech data.49
GM:2021: Whole Life Carbon (WLC) Reduction 38	Significantly lower upfront embodied carbon (Modules A1-A5) due to less energy-intensive manufacturing and carbon sequestration during tree growth. Potential for lower end-of-life carbon if designed for disassembly and reuse.11	Singapore Building Carbon Calculator (SBCC) 10, Requirement for EPDs.43
GM:2021: Sustainable Construction / Materials (referring to general principles, specific criteria in GM:2021 technical guides)	Use of renewable resource (timber from sustainably managed forests). Use of certified wood (FSC/PEFC). Reduced construction waste due to prefabrication.11	Singapore Green Building Product (SGBP) certification scheme, MET Guidebook.12
GM:2021: Energy Efficiency (Operational) 38	Good natural thermal insulation properties of wood can contribute to reduced cooling demand. Airtightness achievable with precise MET construction can also improve HVAC efficiency.21	Energy Modelling Guidelines 38, Green Mark criteria for passive design and active systems efficiency.
Productivity (aligns with DfMA thrust in ITM) 12	Prefabrication leads to faster on-site assembly, reduced manpower, improved safety, and better quality control.11	DfMA criteria within Green Mark, Productivity Gateway Framework, Land Intensification Allowance (LIA) for DfMA facilities.27

 

5. Showcasing Innovation: Landmark MET Projects in Singapore

 

The adoption of Mass Engineered Timber (MET) in Singapore has moved beyond theoretical discussions to tangible, impactful projects. These pioneering developments not only showcase the architectural and structural capabilities of MET but also serve as crucial learning platforms and demonstrators for the broader Singapore Construction industry. The Building and Construction Authority (BCA) has actively supported this adoption, including seeking to fund MET projects to encourage innovation and build local expertise.⁵²

 

Case Study 1: JTC’s Punggol Digital District (PDD) Timber Industrial Building – A New Benchmark for Industrial Green Building

 

JTC Corporation has been at the forefront of developing sustainable industrial infrastructure in Singapore. A standout example is the eight-storey Mass Engineered Timber industrial building located within the Punggol Digital District (PDD).¹⁹ The PDD itself is Singapore’s largest mixed-use development to achieve the Green Mark Platinum District certification, indicating a comprehensive approach to sustainability across the entire precinct.¹⁹

• MET Utilized: While specific types like CLT and Glulam are standard for such structures, the key takeaway is the scale and application in an industrial context.
• Sustainability Metrics: This MET building has achieved the BCA Green Mark Platinum Super Low Energy (SLE) Certification, signifying energy savings of at least 40% compared to conventional buildings.¹⁹ Perhaps its most remarkable achievement is its embodied carbon performance, which is 15 kgCO2e/m2. This figure is an astounding 98% lower than the BCA’s benchmark of 1,000 kgCO2e/m2 for non-residential buildings, highlighting MET’s profound impact on reducing upfront carbon emissions.¹⁹ The timber used for its construction was sourced from sustainably managed forests, ensuring responsible material procurement.¹⁹
• Construction Innovations & Productivity: The project leveraged the DfMA approach, with MET components fabricated off-site. This led to superior construction quality control and a significant 60% reduction in on-site manpower requirements compared to traditional construction methods.¹⁹
• Key Learnings & Impact: The JTC PDD MET building serves as a powerful demonstration of MET’s viability for multi-storey industrial applications in Singapore. It sets a new standard for low-carbon construction in the industrial sector and underscores JTC’s commitment to championing sustainable and productive industrial spaces. This project provides tangible proof of MET’s capabilities, building confidence within the local industry and offering valuable data for future developments.

 

Case Study 2: Nanyang Technological University (NTU) – A Living Laboratory for MET

 

Nanyang Technological University (NTU) has embraced MET in several iconic structures, transforming its campus into a showcase for sustainable Green Building design and innovation.

 

NTU Gaia (Nanyang Business School Building)

 

• Description: Gaia stands as Asia’s largest wooden building, an impressive six-storey structure with a gross floor area of 43,500 square meters.³⁵ Designed by the Pritzker Prize-winning Japanese architect Toyo Ito, Gaia is home to the Nanyang Business School.
• MET Utilized: The building’s structure incorporates approximately 13,000 cubic meters of Glulam and Cross-Laminated Timber.³⁵ This timber was responsibly sourced from sustainably managed forests located in Austria, Sweden, and Finland.¹⁷
• Sustainability Features: Gaia has achieved the BCA Green Mark Platinum (Zero Energy) certification, making it NTU’s eighth zero-energy building.³⁵ This remarkable feat is supported by 800 rooftop solar photovoltaic panels generating around 516,000 kWh of clean energy annually.³⁵ The design prioritizes passive strategies, including sun-shading fins, extensive open areas, terraces, and air wells for natural ventilation, complemented by passive displacement ventilation and cooling coils in its air-conditioning system.³⁵ Minimalist finishes, such as exposed timber, concrete, and brick, were adopted to reduce the embodied energy associated with additional finishing materials.⁵³
• Construction: The MET components were prefabricated off-site and assembled on-site using a “Lego-style” approach. This method resulted in a 35% reduction in construction time and significantly minimized on-site dust, debris, and noise pollution compared to traditional building methods.¹⁷

 

NTU The Wave (Sports Hall)

 

• Description: The Wave was a pioneering MET project in the region, recognized as the first large-scale building in Southeast Asia to be constructed using this innovative wood technology.³³ It is a three-storey high sports hall featuring a distinctive 72-meter wave-like roof and housing three full-sized basketball courts without any internal support pillars.
• MET Utilized: The impressive roof structure is supported by seven massive timber arches, collectively weighing over 440 tonnes.³³
• Sustainability Features: The Wave boasts superior thermal insulation, reportedly five times better than concrete. It incorporates a special cooling system where external walls have two layers with an air pocket and special metal coils with chilled water flowing through them; this cools the incoming air, eliminating the need for conventional air-conditioning and contributing to an estimated energy reduction of over 40%. The facility also utilizes energy-saving LED lighting and solar-powered systems.³³

These NTU projects, particularly Gaia, serve as powerful global exemplars of what can be achieved with MET in terms of scale, architectural expression, and sustainability performance.

 

Case Study 3: Woh Hup Technical Hub

 

• Project Overview: The Woh Hup Technical Hub features a 4-storey office building constructed using MET, as part of a larger project that embraced various DfMA technologies.¹⁸
• MET Utilized: The office structure utilized Glulam for its columns and beams, and CLT for the floor slabs, with a total of approximately 300 tons of MET incorporated into the project.¹⁸
• Productivity Gains: The use of MET yielded significant productivity improvements. The MET structure was completed in less than six weeks, achieving a productivity improvement of over 20%. The installation rate for MET was recorded at 7.1 m2/man-day, which is notably more efficient than conventional concrete construction methods. This efficiency was further aided by the use of simple machinery like floor winches and cordless handheld tools.¹⁸
• Technical Details: To enhance acoustic comfort, a 10 mm granulated acoustic mat was installed directly on the CLT floor slabs, achieving an acoustic rating in the region of STC 44. The MET components also received on-site treatment for termite and water resistance, addressing key durability concerns in the tropical climate.¹⁸

The Woh Hup Technical Hub provides a practical demonstration of MET’s productivity benefits in a commercial office application within Singapore, offering valuable data on construction speed and manpower efficiency.

 

Other Notable MET Projects (Brief Mentions)

 

Several other projects in Singapore have also incorporated MET, further signaling its growing acceptance:

• Eunoia Junior College: Featured as a BCA MET case study, indicating its significance in the educational sector.¹³
• Kong Meng San Phor Kark See Monastery: Utilized Glulam structures, supplied and installed by specialists like Venturer Timberwork.⁵⁵
• Jurong Lake Gardens: Features six timber pavilions, and was one of the pioneering projects to benefit from a BCA incentive scheme specifically encouraging the use of mass timber to reduce embodied carbon.⁵⁶

 

Analysis of Design Innovations, Sustainability Metrics, and Key Takeaways

 

These case studies collectively highlight several critical takeaways for the Singapore Construction industry:

• DfMA as a Standard Approach: All successful MET projects heavily rely on the DfMA methodology, emphasizing off-site prefabrication and streamlined on-site assembly. This approach is fundamental to realizing MET’s productivity benefits.
• Significant Carbon Reduction: The projects consistently demonstrate MET’s ability to drastically reduce embodied carbon compared to conventional construction, a crucial factor in meeting Singapore’s Green Building and climate goals.
• Enhanced Productivity: Reductions in construction time and on-site manpower are consistently reported, addressing key challenges in Singapore’s resource-constrained construction environment.
• Versatility Across Typologies: The successful application of MET in industrial, educational, commercial, and recreational/cultural buildings showcases its versatility and adaptability to diverse project requirements.
• Addressing Local Challenges: Projects like NTU Gaia and Woh Hup Technical Hub demonstrate that challenges specific to the tropical climate, such as moisture and pest management, can be effectively addressed through careful design, material treatment, and construction practices.¹⁷
• Importance of Collaboration: The success of these projects often hinges on close collaboration between architects, structural engineers, MET specialists, manufacturers, and main contractors from the early design stages. This integrated approach is essential for optimizing MET design and overcoming potential challenges.

The visibility and documented success of these landmark projects are instrumental in building industry confidence, providing tangible proof of MET’s capabilities, and paving the way for its wider adoption in Singapore. They serve not only as architectural and engineering achievements but also as educational resources for the entire built environment sector.

Table 3: Snapshot of Landmark MET Projects in Singapore

Project Name	Building Type	MET Utilized	Key Sustainability/Productivity Achievements	Source Snippets
JTC Punggol Digital District (PDD) MET Building	Industrial	Mass Engineered Timber (specific types likely CLT & Glulam)	Green Mark Platinum SLE Certified (≥40% energy savings). Embodied carbon: 15 kgCO2e/m2 (98% lower than BCA benchmark). Timber from sustainably managed forests. 60% reduction in on-site manpower.	19
NTU Gaia (Nanyang Business School)	Educational / Institutional	Approx. 13,000m³ of Glulam and CLT	Green Mark Platinum (Zero Energy). 800 rooftop solar panels (516,000 kWh/year). Passive cooling strategies. Minimalist finishes. 35% reduction in construction time. Timber from sustainably managed forests (Austria, Sweden, Finland). Asia’s largest wooden building.	17
NTU The Wave (Sports Hall)	Sports Facility	Seven timber arches (over 440 tonnes) for roof structure	First large-scale MET building in SE Asia. 5x better heat insulation than concrete. Special cooling system (no conventional AC). >40% estimated energy reduction. LED lighting, solar power.	33
Woh Hup Technical Hub (Office Building)	Commercial Office	Glulam for columns/beams, CLT for floor slabs (approx. 300 tons total)	MET structure completed in < 6 weeks. >20% productivity improvement. MET installation rate: 7.1 m2/man-day. Acoustic rating STC 44. On-site termite & water resistance treatment.	18
Jurong Lake Gardens (Pavilions)	Recreational / Cultural	Timber pavilions	One of first projects to use BCA incentive scheme for MET to reduce embodied carbon.	56
Kong Meng San Phor Kark See Monastery	Religious / Cultural	Glulam structures	Showcases application of Glulam in religious architecture.	55

 

6. Addressing the Hurdles: Challenges to Widespread MET Adoption in Singapore

 

Despite the compelling advantages and successful pioneering projects, the widespread adoption of Mass Engineered Timber (MET) in Singapore Construction faces several challenges. These hurdles span environmental considerations specific to the tropical climate, supply chain complexities, economic factors, industry knowledge, and regulatory aspects. Addressing these systematically is crucial for MET to realize its full potential in Singapore’s Green Building revolution.

 

The Tropical Test: Environmental Considerations for MET in Singapore

 

Singapore’s hot, humid, and rainy tropical climate presents unique environmental challenges for timber construction that are often less acute in temperate regions where MET first gained widespread traction.³⁴

• Moisture and Humidity Management:
  • The Challenge: Timber is a hygroscopic material, meaning it naturally absorbs and releases moisture from its surroundings to reach equilibrium with the ambient relative humidity.⁵⁸ Singapore’s consistently high humidity levels (often above 80%) and frequent rainfall ⁵⁷ mean that unprotected or improperly detailed timber can absorb excessive moisture. This can lead to issues such as fungal decay (rot), mould growth (which can cause aesthetic issues and health concerns for occupants), and dimensional instability like swelling or warping if not adequately managed.³⁴ The initial mould issues observed at NTU Gaia, attributed to condensation and rain exposure, underscore this vulnerability, even though the timber itself was not found to be the primary cause.⁵⁴
  • Mitigation Strategies: Effective moisture management is paramount. This begins with specifying kiln-dried timber with an appropriate initial moisture content. Design detailing plays a critical role: elevating timber elements from ground contact, ensuring proper drainage for roofs and horizontal surfaces, avoiding water traps, and providing adequate ventilation are essential.⁵⁸ The use of protective coatings, sealants (especially for end grains), and vapor barriers can further protect MET elements.¹⁷ During construction, just-in-time delivery, careful on-site storage (e.g., under cover, off the ground), and protection from rain are crucial.¹⁷ Regular inspection and maintenance throughout the building’s life are also necessary to identify and address any moisture ingress promptly.²⁵ For NTU Gaia, remediation involved chemical cleaning, improved ventilation strategies, and managing AC systems to prevent condensation.⁵⁴
• Pest Concerns (Termites):
  • The Challenge: Tropical climates like Singapore’s provide an ideal environment for termites and other wood-boring insects, which can pose a significant threat to timber structures if not adequately protected.²⁵ Subterranean termites, common in Singapore, thrive in moist soil conditions.⁵⁷
  • Mitigation Strategies: A multi-pronged approach is necessary. This includes using timber species with natural resistance or, more commonly, pressure-treating timber with preservatives. Physical barriers, such as stainless steel mesh or termite-resistant sand barriers installed during construction, can prevent termite entry from the ground.⁵⁹ Chemical soil treatments around the building foundation can create a protective barrier.⁶⁰ Design strategies like elevating the lowest timber elements well above ground level and avoiding direct timber-to-ground contact are fundamental.²⁵ Regular inspections for signs of termite activity (e.g., mud tubes, frass) and maintaining low moisture content in and around the timber are critical ongoing measures.⁵⁹ Baiting systems can also be employed to control existing colonies.⁶¹
• UV Exposure:
  • The Challenge: Singapore’s intense tropical sunlight can lead to the degradation and discoloration of exposed timber surfaces over time due to ultraviolet (UV) radiation.²⁵ While this is primarily an aesthetic concern, prolonged UV exposure can also affect the surface integrity of the wood.
  • Mitigation Strategies: Applying UV-resistant sealants, stains, or coatings can protect the timber surface.²⁵ Architectural design can also play a role through the use of overhangs, louvers, or other shading elements to minimize direct sun exposure on timber facades. Regular maintenance and reapplication of protective finishes may be required over the building’s lifespan.

Successfully addressing these climate-specific challenges requires a deep understanding of timber behavior in tropical environments and the diligent application of appropriate design, treatment, construction, and maintenance practices. The BCA’s MET Guidebook and Information Kit provide specific guidance on these aspects.²⁵

 

Supply Chain Dynamics and Local Expertise

 

The MET supply chain in Singapore and Southeast Asia is still developing compared to more established markets in Europe and North America.

• Sourcing and Certification: A significant portion of MET products used in Singapore, particularly large structural elements like CLT and Glulam, is currently imported, predominantly from European manufacturers.¹² Ensuring a consistent and reliable supply of high-quality, sustainably certified (FSC/PEFC) timber is crucial.¹¹ While there are suppliers and fabricators focusing on the Southeast Asian market ⁵⁵, the scale and breadth of local manufacturing for primary MET components remain limited.
• Logistics and Transportation: The transportation of large, prefabricated MET components from overseas or even regional manufacturing plants to Singapore construction sites requires meticulous logistical planning and coordination. Just-in-time delivery strategies are often employed to minimize on-site storage time and potential exposure to adverse weather.³⁴
• Skilled Workforce: The design, engineering, fabrication detailing, and on-site assembly of MET structures require specialized knowledge and skills that may not yet be widespread within the local construction industry.³⁴ There is a need for upskilling architects, engineers, quantity surveyors, and construction workers to handle MET projects effectively.
• Manufacturing Capabilities: While some local firms offer specialized timber fabrication and contracting services ⁵⁵, the capacity for large-scale primary manufacturing of MET products like CLT and Glulam within Singapore is not yet established. This reliance on imports can impact project lead times and costs.

Developing a more mature and resilient regional supply chain, coupled with enhanced local expertise and potentially some level of local value-added processing or fabrication, could significantly boost MET adoption.

 

Economic Considerations: Balancing Upfront Costs and Lifecycle Value

 

Cost is a significant factor in any construction project, and MET is often perceived as having higher upfront material costs compared to conventional materials like concrete and steel.⁵¹

• Perceived Higher Upfront Costs: The initial purchase price of MET components can sometimes be higher than that of traditional materials. This perception can be a barrier, especially if project decisions are based solely on initial capital expenditure without considering lifecycle benefits.⁵² Some contractors may also price MET projects higher due to unfamiliarity or perceived risk.⁶⁶
• Achieving Cost Competitiveness: The overall cost-effectiveness of MET projects depends on several factors. Engaging experienced consultants and contractors who are familiar with MET can help optimize design and construction processes, leading to cost savings.⁶⁶ The significant productivity benefits of MET – such as faster construction timelines, reduced on-site labor requirements, and potentially smaller foundation needs due to MET’s lighter weight – can offset higher material costs and lead to overall project savings.¹¹
• Lifecycle Value: It is crucial to consider the lifecycle value of MET buildings. Their potential for lower operational energy costs (due to better thermal performance), durability (if properly designed and maintained), and potentially higher property values or rental rates associated with Green Building certifications contribute to a favorable long-term economic case.⁶

A holistic economic assessment that factors in both upfront costs and long-term operational savings, as well as the monetizable benefits of faster project delivery, is necessary to accurately evaluate the financial viability of MET.

 

Bridging the Knowledge Gap and Evolving Industry Mindsets

 

The adoption of any new technology or material often faces challenges related to awareness, perception, and established practices.

• Awareness and Education: There is a need for continued efforts to raise awareness and educate building professionals (architects, engineers, contractors, developers) and clients about the true benefits, technical characteristics, and appropriate applications of MET.⁵² Misconceptions about timber, particularly regarding fire performance and durability in the tropics, need to be addressed with factual information and evidence from successful projects.
• Overcoming Inertia: The construction industry often exhibits inertia, with a preference for familiar materials and methods like concrete and steel.³⁰ Overcoming this requires demonstrating MET’s advantages convincingly and de-risking its adoption through clear guidelines, proven case studies, and supportive policies.
• Training and Upskilling: Developing a skilled local workforce proficient in MET design, engineering, and construction is essential. This includes specialized training programs and continuous professional development initiatives. The BCA offers MET-related courses to help build industry capability.¹³

 

Regulatory Evolution and Standardization

 

While Singapore has made significant strides in developing a supportive regulatory framework for MET, continuous evolution is necessary.

• Ensuring that building codes, fire safety regulations, and technical standards keep pace with ongoing innovations in MET materials, connection technologies, and construction applications is vital.
• The BCA’s role in providing clear, updated guidelines (like the MET Guidebook ¹²) and endorsing acceptable solutions (like Eurocode 5 ¹³) remains crucial for maintaining industry confidence and facilitating compliance.

Addressing these challenges requires a concerted effort from all stakeholders, including government agencies, industry associations, research institutions, and private sector players. The successful navigation of these hurdles will determine the pace and scale of MET’s integration into Singapore’s built environment. The fact that MET is being considered and adopted despite these challenges highlights its strong underlying value proposition, particularly its alignment with Singapore’s drive for sustainability and productivity.

Table 4: Addressing Challenges for MET in Singapore’s Context

Challenge Category	Specific Issue in Singapore Context	Current/Potential Mitigation Strategies & Solutions	Relevant Snippets
Environmental – Moisture/Humidity	High ambient humidity & frequent rainfall leading to risks of fungal decay, mould, and dimensional instability.	Kiln-drying, climate-specific design (drainage, ventilation), protective coatings/sealants, vapor barriers, controlled site storage, regular inspection & maintenance. NTU Gaia: chemical cleaning, improved AC management.	17
Environmental – Pests	Tropical climate conducive to termite and wood-boring insect infestation.	Use of treated timber, physical barriers (mesh, sand), chemical soil treatment, design to elevate timber from ground, regular inspections, maintaining low moisture.	25
Environmental – UV Exposure	Intense tropical sunlight causing discolouration and surface degradation of exposed timber.	Application of UV-resistant sealants/coatings, architectural shading elements, regular maintenance of finishes.	25
Supply Chain – Sourcing & Logistics	Predominant reliance on imported MET (mainly from Europe), logistical complexities for large prefabricated components.	Diversified sourcing, exploring regional suppliers (e.g.62), just-in-time delivery, careful logistical planning.	12
Supply Chain – Skills & Local Manufacturing	Shortage of designers, engineers, and contractors experienced in MET. Limited local large-scale primary MET manufacturing.	BCA MET-related courses 13, industry training programs, upskilling initiatives. Exploring potential for local value-added processing.	13
Economic – Upfront Cost	Perception of MET having higher initial material costs compared to conventional materials.	Lifecycle cost analysis, factoring in productivity savings (faster construction, reduced labor, smaller foundations), experienced consultants for design optimization.	67
Industry – Mindset/Awareness	Inertia and preference for traditional materials (concrete/steel); misconceptions about MET’s performance (e.g., fire, durability).	Education and awareness campaigns, showcasing successful local case studies, BCA MET Guidebook and advocacy.	12
Regulatory – Standardization & Evolution	Ensuring codes and standards keep pace with MET innovations and address local conditions comprehensively.	Ongoing review and updating of BCA guidelines, Fire Code provisions for MET, adoption of international standards like Eurocode 5.	12

 

7. The Future is Timber-Framed: MET’s Expanding Role in Singapore’s Green Revolution

 

Mass Engineered Timber (MET) has already made significant inroads into Singapore Construction, demonstrating its viability and benefits across various pioneering projects. As the nation intensifies its pursuit of sustainability and productivity, the future for MET looks promising, with potential for wider applications, deeper integration with other green technologies, and continued innovation.

 

Untapped Potential: Exploring Wider Applications for MET in Singapore

 

While early MET projects in Singapore have often been in institutional, commercial, or specialized industrial buildings, there is considerable untapped potential for its application in mainstream construction sectors.

• Multi-Story Residential Buildings: Globally, MET, particularly CLT, is increasingly being used for mid-rise and even high-rise residential buildings due to its speed of construction, sustainability credentials, and creation of desirable living environments. New York City, for example, is planning a large mass timber residential project with over 500 mixed-income housing units.⁷⁰ Washington State University is also researching hybrid mass timber modules for affordable housing.⁷¹ In Singapore, while the Housing & Development Board (HDB) has been actively driving sustainability in public housing and is exploring alternative building materials to reduce carbon footprint, MET has not yet been explicitly named as a primary structural material for large-scale HDB projects. However, the successful use of MET in private residential and other building types locally, coupled with global trends, suggests a future possibility. The ability to prefabricate entire apartment modules or significant portions thereof using MET aligns well with HDB’s long-standing adoption of precast concrete technology and its push for higher productivity.
• Commercial and Institutional Expansion: The success of projects like NTU Gaia and the Woh Hup Technical Hub paves the way for more widespread use of MET in office buildings, schools, healthcare facilities, and community centers. The aesthetic appeal, biophilic benefits, and rapid construction are strong drivers in these sectors.
• Infrastructure Projects: While less common, the structural properties of Glulam make it suitable for certain infrastructure applications, such as pedestrian bridges, pavilions (as seen in Jurong Lake Gardens ⁵⁶), and potentially elements of transport interchanges or specialized industrial structures.

The vision of taller engineered wood hybrid buildings becoming a reality in Asia within a few years, as suggested by industry experts ⁷², indicates a growing confidence in MET’s capabilities for more ambitious structures.

 

Synergies with Other Green Technologies and Materials

 

The future of sustainable construction likely lies not in a single miracle material but in the intelligent combination of various green technologies and materials. MET is well-positioned to be a key component in such integrated solutions.

• Hybrid Construction: One of the most promising avenues is hybrid construction, where MET is used in conjunction with other materials like low-carbon concrete or green steel.⁷² This approach allows designers to leverage the optimal properties of each material where they are most effective. For instance, MET could be used for floor slabs and walls for its lightness and carbon benefits, while a concrete core might be used for lateral stability in taller buildings, or steel for long-span connections. Venturer Timberwork, a notable player in Singapore, is actively exploring how MET can work with concrete and steel to provide coherent and aesthetically expressive solutions.⁷² Given Singapore’s extensive research and adoption of low-carbon concrete solutions, the potential for synergistic hybrid systems is significant. This pragmatic approach can accelerate MET adoption by integrating it into familiar construction systems while still achieving substantial sustainability gains.
• Integration with Smart Building Technologies: The precision and off-site fabrication inherent in MET construction (DfMA) facilitate easier and more accurate integration of smart building technologies. Service conduits, sensor placements, and interfaces for building management systems (BMS) can be planned and incorporated during the design and manufacturing stages, leading to more efficient installation and better-performing smart buildings.
• Renewable Energy Integration: MET buildings can be designed to seamlessly incorporate renewable energy systems. The structural capacity of MET roofs can readily accommodate solar photovoltaic (PV) panels, as demonstrated by NTU Gaia ³⁵ and The Wave.³³ The combination of a low-carbon building fabric with on-site renewable energy generation is a powerful strategy for achieving net-zero energy buildings.

 

Driving Innovation: The Next Wave of MET Advancements

 

The field of Mass Engineered Timber is continually evolving, with ongoing research and development focused on enhancing its properties, applications, and manufacturing processes.

• Material and Connection Innovations: R&D efforts globally are exploring new types of engineered wood products, improved adhesives, and more efficient and robust connection systems. There is also research into enhancing the durability of MET, particularly its resistance to moisture and pests in challenging climates, and improving its fire performance further.
• Advanced Manufacturing and Digitalization: The manufacturing of MET is becoming increasingly sophisticated, with greater use of automation, robotics, and artificial intelligence to optimize production, improve quality control, and reduce waste.²⁰ Integrated Digital Delivery (IDD), from BIM-based design to digitally controlled fabrication and on-site assembly logistics, is crucial for maximizing MET’s benefits. The adoption of MET, with its reliance on DfMA and IDD ¹², can act as a catalyst for the wider digitalization and industrialization of the entire
  Singapore Construction Skills and technologies developed for MET projects are transferable and beneficial for other advanced construction methods, fostering a broader industry transformation.
• Government Support for R&D: Singapore’s government has shown a commitment to fostering innovation in sustainable construction. Programs like the Green Buildings Innovation Cluster (GBIC) ¹ and dedicated funding for sustainable construction materials research (SGD 50 million, including for CLT ⁵¹) provide a supportive ecosystem for MET-related advancements. The SG Eco Fund also supports innovative environmental projects, which could include MET applications.⁷³

 

The Path to Net-Zero: MET’s Contribution to Singapore’s Long-Term Climate Goals

 

As Singapore and the world move towards a net-zero carbon future, MET is poised to play an increasingly vital role in decarbonizing the built environment.

• Reducing Upfront Embodied Carbon: The most immediate and significant contribution of MET is its ability to drastically reduce the upfront embodied carbon in new buildings. As operational energy efficiency improves due to stricter building codes and better technologies, embodied carbon will account for a larger proportion of a building’s total lifecycle carbon emissions. Tackling embodied carbon is therefore critical, and MET offers one of the most effective solutions currently available, as evidenced by the JTC PDD project’s 98% reduction.¹⁹
• Potential for Carbon-Negative Buildings: When timber is sourced from sustainably managed forests (where harvesting is balanced by replanting, ensuring continuous carbon uptake by growing trees) and MET components are designed for longevity and eventual reuse or recycling, MET buildings have the potential to be carbon-negative over their lifecycle. This means they could store more carbon than is emitted during their entire existence, including production, construction, operation, and end-of-life.
• Alignment with Global Decarbonization Trends: The shift towards mass timber construction is a global trend, driven by increasing awareness of the climate crisis and the urgent need to decarbonize the building sector. By embracing MET, Singapore aligns itself with international best practices and contributes to global efforts to create a more sustainable built environment.

The potential for widespread public sector adoption, particularly by the Housing & Development Board (HDB), could be a game-changer for MET in Singapore. While HDB is currently exploring alternative materials to reduce carbon footprint, a large-scale commitment to MET for public housing would create significant economies of scale, drive down costs, mature the local supply chain, and rapidly build industry expertise. This would mirror the transformative impact HDB had on the precast concrete industry in previous decades and could truly mainstream MET in Singapore Construction.

 

8. Conclusion: Constructing a Sustainable Legacy with Mass Engineered Timber

 

The journey of Mass Engineered Timber (MET) in Singapore is a compelling narrative of innovation meeting imperative. As a nation steadfastly committed to sustainability and a highly productive, advanced economy, Singapore finds in MET a construction solution that powerfully addresses both its environmental aspirations and its drive for industry transformation. The evidence presented throughout this analysis underscores MET’s multifaceted benefits – its significantly lower carbon footprint compared to conventional materials, its role as a carbon sink, its alignment with productivity-enhancing Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA) principles, its excellent structural and building performance characteristics, and its positive impact on occupant well-being.

MET is not merely an alternative material; it is a catalyst for change within the Singapore Construction sector. Its adoption directly supports the ambitious targets of the Singapore Green Building Masterplan, particularly the “80-80-80 in 2030” goals, by offering a tangible pathway to reducing embodied carbon and promoting the use of renewable resources.⁴ Furthermore, MET is a cornerstone technology for realizing the vision of the Construction Industry Transformation Map, fostering a shift towards off-site manufacturing, integrated digital delivery, and ultimately, a more efficient and sustainable building process.¹² Landmark projects such as JTC’s Punggol Digital District MET building and NTU’s Gaia have not only showcased the architectural beauty and structural prowess of timber but have also provided invaluable data on its performance, sustainability metrics, and productivity gains in the local context.¹⁹However, the path to widespread MET adoption is not without its challenges. The tropical climate of Singapore necessitates meticulous attention to moisture management and pest protection.²⁵ The supply chain, while growing, still relies significantly on imports, and there is an ongoing need to develop local expertise and potentially, greater domestic manufacturing or value-added capabilities.¹² Perceptions regarding cost and fire safety, though often addressable through lifecycle costing and robust engineering, require continuous education and demonstration of successful outcomes.²⁶

To fully unlock MET’s potential and solidify its role in Singapore’s Green Building revolution, a collective and sustained effort is required:

1. Continued Government Leadership and Support: The Singaporean government, through agencies like the BCA, SCDF, and JTC, should continue to provide strong policy direction, financial incentives (such as the Green Mark scheme, the Land Intensification Allowance for DfMA facilities ²⁷, and R&D funding ⁵¹), and support for the development of standards and guidelines that facilitate MET adoption while ensuring safety and quality. Exploring the large-scale use of MET in public housing projects could be a significant catalyst for market development.
2. Industry Collaboration and Innovation: Developers, architects, engineers, contractors, and MET suppliers must collaborate closely from the early stages of projects to optimize designs, streamline processes, and share knowledge. Investment in R&D, particularly for tropical applications and hybrid systems, will be crucial for pushing the boundaries of MET technology.
3. Capacity Building and Skills Development: A concerted effort is needed to upskill the local workforce across the entire construction value chain. This includes enhancing university curricula, vocational training programs, and continuous professional development courses focused on MET design, engineering, and construction.
4. Public Awareness and Advocacy: Continued advocacy and dissemination of information about MET’s benefits and the successful implementation in local projects can help shift mindsets and build greater public and client acceptance.

The “Green Building Revolution” in Singapore is a long-term endeavor, requiring sustained commitment from all stakeholders. MET is a critical part of this transformation, offering a pathway to construct buildings that are not only environmentally responsible but also aesthetically pleasing, structurally sound, and conducive to human health and well-being. By embracing Mass Engineered Timber, Singapore has the opportunity not only to achieve its national sustainability goals but also to position itself as a regional leader in innovative and sustainable construction practices for tropical climates. The continued ascendance of wood in Singapore Construction promises to build a lasting legacy of resilience, productivity, and environmental stewardship for generations to come.

Works cited

1. Singapore Green Building Masterplan, accessed June 9, 2025, https://www.sgbc.sg/sgbmp/
2. Our Targets – Singapore Green Plan 2030, accessed June 9, 2025, https://www.greenplan.gov.sg/targets/
3. Sustainable Building and Construction in Singapore – ESCI KSP, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.esci-ksp.org/wp/wp-content/uploads/2016/12/CIB21705.pdf
4. Buildings – National Climate Change Secretariat, accessed June 9, 2025, https://www.nccs.gov.sg/singapores-climate-action/mitigation-efforts/buildings/
5. nccs.gov.sg, accessed June 9, 2025, https://www.nccs.gov.sg/singapores-climate-action/mitigation-efforts/buildings/#:~:text=Singapore%20Green%20Building%20Masterplan%20(SGBMP)&text=The%20SGBMP%20aims%20to%20deliver,buildings%20from%202030%20onwards%3B%20and
6. The Green Mark Certification Scheme explained – CIM.io, accessed June 9, 2025, https://www.cim.io/blog/the-green-mark-certification-scheme-explained
7. Understanding Green Mark 2021 – Singapore, accessed June 9, 2025, https://www.bcaa.edu.sg/docs/librariesprovider2/learning-journeys/understanding-green-mark-2021-_bimonthlyd7e27a5a3145467bbc65feda0261bba4.pdf?sfvrsn=18a73c85_0
8. accessed January 1, 1970, https://www.usgbc.org/leed
9. sgbc.sg, accessed June 9, 2025, https://www.sgbc.sg/sgbmp/#:~:text=Singapore%20Green%20Plan%202030.,80%2D80%20in%202030%E2%80%9D.&text=The%20earlier%20editions%20of%20the,Singapore’s%20buildings%20have%20been%20greened.
10. Embodied Carbon Calculator – Singapore Green Building Council, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.sgbc.sg/embodied-carbon-calculator/
11. A Guide to Mass Timber Construction: The Future of Sustainable Architecture and The Role of Forestry – Rayonier, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.rayonier.com/stories/a-guide-to-mass-timber-construction-the-future-of-sustainable-architecture-and-the-role-of-forestry/
12. Mass Engineered Timber (MET) Guidebook – Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed June 10, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-news-and-publications/publications/for-industry/met_guidebook_2018.pdf
13. Mass Engineered Timber | Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed June 10, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/productivity/design-for-manufacturing-and-assembly-dfma/mass-engineered-timber
14. com, accessed June 10, 2025, https://kallesoemachinery.com/the-green-products-of-the-future/what-is-the-difference-between-clt-and-glulam/#:~:text=These%20materials%2C%20referred%20to%20as,such%20as%20beams%2C%20or%20columns.
15. What Is the Difference Between CLT and Glulam? – Kallesoe Machinery, accessed June 10, 2025, https://kallesoemachinery.com/the-green-products-of-the-future/what-is-the-difference-between-clt-and-glulam/
16. Advisory on Good Practices for the Design, Inspection and Maintenance of Mass Engineered Timber (MET) Structures – Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed June 10, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-news-and-publications/circulars/advisory-on-good-practices-for-the-inspection-and-maintenance-of-mass-engineered-timber-structures01032022.pdf
17. Case Study: Nanyang Technological University’s Academic Building South, Singapore – News | Stora Enso, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.storaenso.com/en/newsroom/news/2023/4/nanyang-technological-universitys-academic-building-south
18. Case Study – Woh Hup Technical Hub | Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed June 10, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/productivity/design-for-manufacturing-and-assembly-dfma/mass-engineered-timber/mass-engineered-timber-case-study-woh-hup-technical-hub
19. Punggol Digital District clinches Platinum Award for BCA Green …, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.jtc.gov.sg/about-jtc/news-and-stories/press-releases/punggol-digital-district-clinches-platinum-award-for-bca-green-mark-districts
20. Expertise | Timber building engineering & MET construction – Aurecon, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.aurecongroup.com/expertise/building-design/timber-building-design
21. How a resurgence in timber could redefine the construction industry – Aurecon, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.aurecongroup.com/insights/mass-engineered-timber-construction-industry
22. Sustainable FSC & PEFC Certified Timbers – Hupkes Wijma, accessed June 10, 2025, https://hupkeswijma.com/en/sustainability/certificats
23. Forest Management Certification | SGS Singapore, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.sgs.com/en-sg/services/forest-management-certification
24. Mass timber – the emergence of a modern construction material | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/312056231_Mass_timber_-_the_emergence_of_a_modern_construction_material
25. Mass Engineered Timber (MET) – Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed June 10, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-buildsg/productivity/information-kit-for-met-projects.pdf?sfvrsn=5af04c8d_0
26. Cost Engineering: Mass Timber vs. Concrete & Steel | ASH, accessed June 10, 2025, https://ash.com.au/blog/cost-engineering-mass-timber-vs-concrete-steel/
27. Singapore’s Land Intensification Allowance scheme for built environment sector expanded to optimise industrial land use – Trade Link Media Pte Ltd, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.tradelinkmedia.biz/publications/7/news/5808
28. Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA) | Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed June 10, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/productivity/design-for-manufacturing-and-assembly-dfma
29. Beyond sustainability: four remarkable benefits of mass timber | www.usa.skanska.com, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.usa.skanska.com/who-we-are/media/constructive-thinking/beyond-sustainability-four-remarkable-benefits-of-mass-timber/
30. Why timber buildings are on the rise – JLL, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.jll.com.mx/en/trends-and-insights/cities/why-timber-buildings-are-on-the-rise
31. Integrating Design for Manufacturing and Assembly Principles in Modular Home Construction: A Comprehensive Framework for Enhanced Efficiency and Sustainability – MDPI, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/15/1/103
32. Global Membership Council Webinar Series: – Mass Timber Construction, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.iccsafe.org/wp-content/uploads/GMC-Webinar-2022.07-Mass-Timber-Construction.pdf
33. NTU’s new sports hall is first SEA mega building built using innovative green tech – TODAY, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.todayonline.com/singapore/ntus-new-sports-hall-first-sea-mega-building-built-using-innovative-green-tech
34. Mass Timber: Challenges and Loss Prevention | Insurance Thought …, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.insurancethoughtleadership.com/commercial-lines/mass-timber-challenges-and-loss-prevention
35. Gaia – Nanyang Technological University, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www3.ntu.edu.sg/CorpComms2/Documents/2023/06_Jun/ST_120623_gaia.pdf
36. Codes & Standards – Singapore – SCDF, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.scdf.gov.sg/fire-safety-services-listing/fire-code-2023/codes-and-standards
37. fec8390a-4513-48ef-9500-7c1c28bb99d4 1..4, accessed June 10, 2025, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL-Supp/S97-2016/Published/20160301170000?DocDate=20160301170000&ViewType=Pdf&_=20230106131804
38. Green Mark 2021 | Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed June 10, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/sustainability/green-mark-certification-scheme/green-mark-2021
39. bca-green-mark-2021-certification-scheme.pdf, accessed June 9, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-news-and-publications/media-releases/bca-green-mark-2021-certification-scheme.pdf
40. Green Certification | Singapore | Global Sustainable Buildings Guide, accessed June 10, 2025, https://resourcehub.bakermckenzie.com/en/resources/global-sustainable-buildings/asia-pacific/singapore/topics/green-certification
41. Unpacking Green Mark: 2021 Sustainability Sections: Whole Life …, accessed June 10, 2025, https://digitalacademy.sgbc.sg/course/unpacking-green-mark-2021-sustainability-sections-whole-life-carbon-cn-and-intelligence-in
42. Understanding Green Mark 2021 – Singapore – BCA Academy, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.bcaa.edu.sg/what-we-offer/courses/courses-for-professionals-managers-executives/Details/understanding-green-mark-2021
43. Singapore: Green Mark Building Rating System | One Click LCA, accessed June 10, 2025, https://help.oneclicklca.com/en/articles/275726
44. SG Building Carbon Calculator – Singapore Green Building Council, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.sgbc.sg/sg-building-carbon-calculator/
45. Green Buildings Innovation Cluster (GBIC) Programme, accessed June 9, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg/buildsg-transformation-fund/green-buildings-innovation-cluster-gbic-programme
46. Urban Solutions and Sustainability – National Research Foundation Singapore, accessed June 9, 2025, https://www.nrf.gov.sg/rie-ecosystem/ecosystem-wide-fis/uss-fi/
47. Green Buildings Innovation Cluster (GBIC) programme – Policies – IEA, accessed June 9, 2025, https://www.iea.org/policies/18278-green-buildings-innovation-cluster-gbic-programme
48. Industry Interest to Mainstream Super Low Energy Buildings picking up pace, accessed June 9, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/about-us/news-and-publications/media-releases/2021/09/17/industry-interest-to-mainstream-super-low-energy-buildings-picking-up-pace
49. Building a Greener Future | BuildSG Magazine – Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed June 9, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg-emag/articles/building-a-greener-future
50. Keppel Bay Tower certified as Singapore’s first Green Mark Platinum (Zero Energy) commercial building The original target of creating Singapore’s first super low energy highrise existing commercial building has been surpassed – Issuu, accessed June 9, 2025, https://issuu.com/desmond6/docs/tse_feb_21_web/s/11888646
51. The Eco Innovation of Singapore Sustainable Materials Adoption, accessed June 10, 2025, https://marketresearchsingapore.com/insights/articles/eco-innovation-singapore-sustainable-materials-adoption
52. Full article: Industry perceptions of mass engineered timber (MET) construction: a comparison of South-East Asia with other regions, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17452007.2024.2401561
53. Timber wonderland | Alumni | NTU Singapore, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.ntu.edu.sg/alumni/alumni-stories-news/detail/timber-wonderland
54. Mould issue at Gaia due to condensation and rain, not the timber, say two independent experts – Nanyang Technological University, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.ntu.edu.sg/docs/default-source/corporate-ntu/hub-news/mould-issue-at-gaia-due-to-condensation-and-rain-not-the-timber-says-two-independent-experts.pdf?sfvrsn=1ed29e0d_1
55. Venturer Timberwork – Global Timber Contractor, accessed June 10, 2025, https://venturertimberwork.com/
56. Wood Features in Green Building Progress Over the Past 25 Years, accessed June 10, 2025, https://woodcentral.com.au/wood-features-in-green-building-progress-over-the-past-25-years/
57. Water, Wood, Woes: Why Singapore’s Built Environment Is at Risk – ORIGIN Exterminators, accessed June 10, 2025, https://blog.origin.com.sg/water-wood-woes-why-singapores-built-environment-is-at-risk
58. Mastering moisture in mass timber – Elliott Wood, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.elliottwood.co.uk/latest/mastering-moisture-in-mass-timber
59. Best Practices for Maintaining Mass Timber Buildings | AirFixture, accessed June 10, 2025, https://airfixture.com/resources/blog/best-practices-for-maintaining-mass-timber-buildings
60. Protecting Your Home from Termite Damage – Pest Control Singapore, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.pestcontrolsg.com/articles/protecting-your-home-from-termite-damage.html
61. Termites Control in Singapore – Verminator, accessed June 10, 2025, https://verminator.sg/termites/
62. SUMITOMO FORESTRY CO., LTD., accessed June 10, 2025, https://sfc.jp/english/
63. Mass Engineered Timber (MET) Singapore, Sg Solid Wood, Teak Wood | FOREST ROAD PTE LTD, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.oneandonlywood.com.sg/showproducts/productid/4227168/mass-engineered-timber-met/
64. Met Mast Structure Fabrication – VIVABLAST | Leading in Industrial Asset Protection Vietnam, accessed June 10, 2025, https://vivablast.com/our-services/fabrication-solutions/met-mast/
65. Precision Metal Bending Solutions in Southeast Asia – Align MFG, accessed June 10, 2025, https://alignmfg.co/processes/fabrication/bending/
66. Why Mass Timber Makes Sense – and Saves Dollars | HKS Architects, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.hksinc.com/our-news/articles/why-mass-timber-makes-sense/
67. Independent Consultancy Study on BCA Green Mark Schemes – SLEB, accessed June 9, 2025, https://sleb.sg/News/NewsDetails/1209
68. Perception towards Green Buildings in Singapore – Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed June 9, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/docs-corp-buildsg/sustainability/summary_report_survey_on_bca_green_mark.pdf
69. The Business Case for Green Building, accessed June 9, 2025, https://worldgbc.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Business_Case_For_Green_Building_Report_WEB_2013-04-11-2.pdf
70. NYC borough plans 500 mass timber housing units | Woodworking Network, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.woodworkingnetwork.com/news/woodworking-industry-news/nyc-borough-plans-500-mass-timber-housing-units
71. Modular Mass Timber Hybrid Construction for Affordable Housing in the United States, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.huduser.gov/portal/pdredge/pdr-edge-trending-060525.html
72. Venturer Mass Engineered Timber (MET) and Singapore – YouTube, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=51ieZHoR_g8

About SG Eco Fund | Ministry of Sustainability and the Environment, accessed June 10, 2025, https://www.mse.gov.sg/take-action/sgecofund/about