Introduction: The Material Shift in Singapore’s Built Environment

Singapore’s skyline, a testament to decades of meticulous planning and architectural ambition, is often seen as a symbol of economic success. Yet, beneath the gleaming glass and steel lies a quieter, more profound transformation—a material science revolution that is fundamentally reshaping how the city-state builds. 

Advanced composite materials, long the domain of aerospace and high-performance automotive engineering, are no longer a futuristic concept for the construction sector. They are a present-day reality, offering tangible solutions to Singapore’s most pressing challenges in the Built Environment (BE).

This report argues that the adoption of advanced composite materials is no longer a niche or alternative choice but a strategic imperative, directly enabling Singapore’s national goals for construction productivity, environmental sustainability, and long-term infrastructural resilience. 

The convergence of government policy, economic pressures, and technological maturity has created a unique ecosystem where materials like Fiber-Reinforced Polymers (FRPs) are moving from the periphery to the core of modern construction strategy.

To provide a comprehensive analysis for senior professionals across the BE sector—from architects and engineers to developers and policymakers—this report is structured into six distinct parts. It begins by establishing the Singapore Imperative, exploring the critical “pull factors” of productivity demands, sustainability targets, and resilience needs that drive the demand for new material solutions. 

It then provides a Primer for Professionals, deconstructing the technical properties of these materials to build foundational knowledge. The report then moves from theory to practice, showcasing Composites in Action through detailed case studies of new builds, retrofitting projects, and prefabricated systems across Singapore. 

This is followed by an examination of the Ecosystem of Innovation, mapping the regulatory frameworks and research institutions that govern and accelerate adoption. A crucial section on The Business Case shifts the focus from upfront price to long-term lifecycle value, presenting a robust economic argument for composites. 

Finally, the report looks to the horizon, exploring the Future Trajectory of next-generation materials and their role in a circular economy. Together, these sections form a definitive guide to understanding and leveraging advanced composites to build the next chapter of Singapore’s urban story.

 

Part 1: The Singapore Imperative: Why the Future of Construction is Composite

 

The widespread adoption of any new technology is rarely driven by the technology itself, but by the problems it solves. In Singapore, a unique confluence of national challenges has created a powerful set of “pull factors” that make advanced composite materials not just advantageous, but increasingly necessary. 

These imperatives—spanning productivity, sustainability, and resilience—form a web of interconnected pressures that composites are uniquely positioned to address. Understanding this context is fundamental to grasping the strategic importance of the material shift occurring in the nation’s Built Environment sector.

 

1.1 The Productivity and Manpower Crisis

 

For decades, Singapore’s construction industry has grappled with a persistent productivity paradox: despite delivering world-class infrastructure, the sector has been heavily reliant on manual processes and a large foreign workforce.1 This dependency creates significant economic and social vulnerabilities, a reality brought into sharp focus by the labor shortages and project delays experienced during the COVID-19 pandemic.1 

In response, the Singapore government, through the Building and Construction Authority (BCA), has made productivity improvement a central pillar of its long-term strategy. The goal is to transform the sector into a “manpower-lean” industry, capable of doing more with less.3

This top-down policy push has effectively become a primary market creator for advanced composite materials. The government’s key technological strategy to achieve its productivity goals is the aggressive promotion of Design for Manufacturing and Assembly (DfMA).4 

DfMA is a paradigm shift that moves construction activities from the uncontrolled environment of the worksite to the controlled, factory-like setting of an off-site prefabrication facility.4 This includes methods like

Prefabricated Prefinished Volumetric Construction (PPVC), where entire three-dimensional building modules—complete with finishes and fittings—are manufactured in a factory and then transported to the site for assembly.5 The productivity gains are substantial; the BCA reports that DfMA methods like PPVC can improve on-site manpower savings by up to 40%.4

The successful implementation of DfMA and PPVC is intrinsically linked to the properties of the materials used. The process requires materials that are, by nature, lightweight for ease of transportation and cranage, and easily moldable into complex, standardized components in a factory setting. 

Advanced composites, such as Fiber-Reinforced Polymers (FRPs), possess these exact characteristics.7 Their high strength-to-weight ratio means that large, prefabricated panels or even entire PPVC modules can be produced without becoming excessively heavy, simplifying logistics and reducing the size and cost of on-site lifting equipment.9

This creates a clear and direct causal link: the national imperative to solve the manpower crisis leads to a policy focus on DfMA, and the technical requirements of DfMA create a sustained, policy-driven demand for advanced composite systems. 

As the government continues to mandate the use of productive technologies in its Government Land Sales (GLS) sites and public projects undertaken by agencies like the Housing & Development Board (HDB) and JTC Corporation, contractors and developers find that adopting composite-friendly DfMA methods is no longer optional.5 

It is a prerequisite for remaining competitive and compliant, transforming advanced composites from a “nice-to-have” novelty into a “need-to-have” solution for building in modern Singapore.

 

1.2 The Sustainability Mandate and the Green Mark Imperative

 

Parallel to the productivity drive is Singapore’s unwavering commitment to environmental sustainability, a critical goal for a nation vulnerable to the effects of climate change. This commitment is formalized in the Singapore Green Plan 2030 and translated into specific targets for the BE sector by the BCA Green Mark scheme. 

The latest iteration of this scheme sets ambitious “80-80-80 in 2030” goals: to green 80% of buildings by Gross Floor Area (GFA), ensure 80% of new developments are Super Low Energy (SLE) buildings, and achieve an 80% improvement in energy efficiency for best-in-class green buildings over 2005 levels.12

Advanced composites directly support these goals through multiple pathways. Their most obvious contribution is to operational carbon reduction. The building envelope is a major source of heat gain in Singapore’s tropical climate, accounting for nearly 50% of a building’s thermal load.15 

Many composite materials possess excellent thermal insulation properties, far superior to traditional materials like concrete and steel.7 When used in facades, roofing, and wall panels, they reduce thermal bridging and minimize heat transfer, thereby lowering the energy consumption required for air-conditioning and helping buildings achieve the stringent energy efficiency standards of the Green Mark scheme.16

However, the value of composites in Singapore’s green building journey extends beyond operational energy. A pivotal shift in the BCA Green Mark 2021 (GM:2021) scheme was the introduction of a focus on Whole Life Carbon (WLC), which includes the embodied carbon associated with material extraction, manufacturing, and the construction process itself (Modules A1-A5 of a Life Cycle Assessment).14 

This is particularly critical in Singapore, where a compressed building lifecycle means that embodied carbon can account for as much as 40% of a building’s total lifetime emissions—a significantly higher proportion than the global average.14

This new focus on embodied carbon creates a powerful, modern business driver for specifying composites. They contribute to lowering embodied carbon in two crucial ways. First, their lightweight nature reduces the sheer volume of material required for a given structural performance. 

This leads to smaller, lighter superstructures, which in turn require smaller foundations, significantly reducing the amount of carbon-intensive concrete needed for the project.9 Second, the use of composites facilitates the shift to DfMA and off-site prefabrication. Factory-based production is inherently more efficient, leading to less material waste, reduced energy consumption during construction, and fewer truck movements for material transport compared to traditional on-site methods.9 

Furthermore, many composites are themselves becoming more sustainable, with an increasing use of recycled materials (like recycled PET in core materials) and bio-based resins and fibers.18 For developers, architects, and engineers aiming for the highest tiers of Green Mark certification, specifying advanced composites is therefore a direct and effective strategy to address the under-tackled challenge of embodied carbon, adding a compelling layer to their economic and environmental value proposition.

 

1.3 The Resilience Imperative: Aging Infrastructure and a Harsh Climate

 

The third critical driver for composite adoption is the dual challenge of an aging building stock and a relentlessly harsh climate. As a nation that experienced its most rapid development from the 1970s through the 1990s, a significant portion of Singapore’s public housing and infrastructure is now entering its fifth and sixth decades of service.21 

This aging process is accelerated by the local climate, which is characterized by high humidity, intense ultraviolet (UV) radiation, frequent heavy rainfall, and, in coastal areas, a saline atmosphere.7 These conditions are highly corrosive and degrading to traditional construction materials like steel and reinforced concrete. Steel rusts, and concrete is susceptible to carbonation and chloride ingress, which leads to the corrosion of its internal steel reinforcement and results in spalling (the cracking and breaking away of the concrete cover).18

Advanced composites, particularly FRPs, offer a powerful solution to this challenge. Their fundamental chemical composition makes them inherently inert and exceptionally resistant to corrosion, rust, rot, and chemical attack.17 Unlike steel, FRPs do not oxidize. 

Unlike concrete, their polymer matrix is impermeable to moisture and chlorides. This inherent durability translates into a significantly longer service life with drastically reduced maintenance requirements, a critical advantage in an environment that constantly assails building exteriors.7

This makes composites an ideal material for two key applications. For new construction, especially in coastal or industrial zones, using FRP components (such as rebar, structural profiles, or cladding) can build in long-term resilience from the outset, effectively designing out the problem of corrosion. 

For existing structures, FRP systems are a game-changer for retrofitting and repair. The process of strengthening weakened concrete structures with externally bonded FRP sheets or wraps is a well-established engineering practice.26 It is a lightweight, minimally invasive, and highly effective method to restore structural integrity and extend the life of aging assets.8

This convergence of aging infrastructure and a demanding climate suggests a significant future market shift. As the need for large-scale upgrading programs, such as HDB’s Home Improvement Programme (HIP), continues to grow, the long-term performance and efficiency of FRP retrofitting will become increasingly compelling compared to the cycle of repeated, labor-intensive conventional repairs. 

The ability of composites to provide a durable, low-maintenance solution to the pervasive problem of material degradation positions them to move from a specialized repair technique to a standard methodology for infrastructure asset management and life extension in Singapore.

 

Part 2: A Primer for Professionals: Deconstructing Advanced Composites

 

For architects, engineers, and project managers to confidently specify and integrate advanced composites into their projects, a foundational understanding of the materials themselves is essential. 

This section demystifies the terminology, classifies the key materials relevant to construction, and explains how their unique composition gives rise to their remarkable performance characteristics. It moves beyond buzzwords to provide the core technical knowledge needed for informed decision-making.

 

2.1 Defining the Materials: A Construction-Focused Classification

 

At its core, a composite material is formed by combining two or more distinct materials on a macroscopic scale, where the individual components remain separate but act in concert to create a new material with properties superior to those of its constituents.17

While this definition is broad (encompassing even ancient materials like mud brick reinforced with straw), in modern engineering the term “advanced composites” generally refers to materials characterized by unusually high-strength, high-stiffness fibers embedded within a binding matrix.31

For the construction industry, the most relevant and widely used category of advanced composites is Fiber-Reinforced Polymers (FRPs), also known as Fiber-Reinforced Plastics.33 These materials form the basis of most composite applications in building and infrastructure. Within this family, several key types are distinguished by the kind of fiber used for reinforcement 23:

• Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (FRP): This is the broad umbrella term for any composite consisting of fibers embedded in a polymer matrix. It is the most common classification used in civil engineering guidelines and standards.23
• Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (CFRP): As the name suggests, CFRP uses carbon fibers as its reinforcement. Carbon fibers possess exceptionally high tensile strength and stiffness (modulus of elasticity), making CFRP the premium choice for high-performance applications where maximum strength and minimal weight are critical, such as strengthening structurally deficient beams or columns, or in aerospace-grade components.23
• Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (GFRP): This type uses glass fibers, which come in various grades such as E-glass (standard electrical grade) and S-glass (higher strength structural grade).8 While not as stiff or strong as carbon fiber, GFRP offers a compelling balance of good mechanical properties, excellent electrical insulation, and significantly lower cost. This makes it a workhorse material for a vast range of applications, including facade panels, gratings, pipes, and reinforcing bars.8
• Aramid-Fiber-Reinforced Polymer (AFRP): Reinforced with aramid fibers (suchas Kevlar®), AFRP is known for its high impact resistance and toughness, though its use in primary structural applications in construction is less common than CFRP and GFRP.8
• Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC): While not an FRP, ECC is a highly relevant advanced composite in construction. It is a special class of high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete. By carefully tailoring the properties of the cement matrix and incorporating a small volume (typically around 2%) of specialized polymer fibers, such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) fibers, ECC exhibits a unique strain-hardening behavior. Unlike brittle conventional concrete, it can deform under tension and form a network of multiple, fine micro-cracks, giving it an ultra-high ductility and damage tolerance that resembles metal.39 This makes it extremely valuable for applications requiring high energy absorption and resilience, such as in seismic zones or for impact-resistant structures.39

 

2.2 The Anatomy of Performance: Fibers and Matrices

 

The superior properties of an advanced composite material are not magical; they are the direct result of a synergistic partnership between its two primary components: the reinforcement (fibers) and the matrix.

The fiber is the backbone of the composite. It is the primary load-carrying element and is responsible for providing the material’s characteristic high strength and stiffness.29 Fibers can be made from various materials like carbon, glass, or aramid, and are typically bundled into forms such as tows, yarns, or woven fabrics.37 Crucially, a composite is only strong and stiff in the direction of its fibers. This directional dependency, known as

anisotropy, is a defining feature of composites.37

The matrix is the material that surrounds and binds the fibers together. In FRPs, the matrix is a polymer resin, most commonly a thermoset like epoxy, polyester, or vinyl ester.23 The matrix serves several vital functions:

1. It holds the fibers in their desired position and orientation.
2. It transfers the applied load to and between the strong fibers.
3. It protects the fibers from environmental damage, such as moisture and chemical attack.
4. It largely determines the composite’s overall shape, surface quality, and maximum service temperature.37

This interplay between fiber and matrix gives rise to a fundamental shift in design philosophy. When an engineer works with a traditional material like steel, which is isotropic (having uniform properties in all directions), they select a standard grade and shape from a catalog. 

The material’s properties are pre-determined. In contrast, working with composites involves designing the material itself. The engineer or designer has the power to tailor the final properties of the component to meet the specific demands of the application.32 This is achieved by specifying not only the fiber and matrix type but, most importantly, the

fiber orientation. By arranging the plies of fiber fabric in a specific sequence (e.g., a [0°/90°/45°] layup), the designer can create a component that is exceptionally strong along a primary load path while having adequate strength in other directions. This level of customization allows for highly efficient structures that place strength precisely where it is needed, eliminating redundant material and weight. 

It represents a higher level of design sophistication that necessitates closer collaboration between the structural engineer, the material scientist, and the manufacturer to unlock the full potential of the composite.41

 

2.3 Quantifying the Advantage: Key Properties Profiled

 

The theoretical benefits of composites become tangible when their properties are quantified and compared directly against the traditional materials they aim to replace. The following profile highlights the key performance metrics that are most relevant to decision-makers in the construction sector.

• High Strength-to-Weight Ratio: This is arguably the most significant advantage of advanced composites. A component made from CFRP can have the same tensile strength as steel but at only a fraction of the weight.24 This dramatic weight reduction has cascading benefits: it lowers the structural dead load on the rest of the building, which can lead to smaller and less expensive foundations; it reduces the energy and cost required for transportation; and it allows for faster and safer on-site assembly with smaller cranes and less manpower.9
• Durability & Corrosion Resistance: FRPs exhibit outstanding resistance to the environmental factors that plague conventional materials. They do not rust or corrode like steel, nor do they rot or fall prey to pests like wood.9 Their polymer matrix provides an effective barrier against moisture, salt spray, and a wide range of industrial chemicals.7 This leads to a much longer service life and significantly lower lifecycle maintenance costs, a crucial factor for infrastructure in Singapore’s demanding tropical and coastal environment.7
• Design Flexibility: Because composites are formed in a mold, they can be manufactured into complex, curved, and bespoke shapes that would be difficult or prohibitively expensive to achieve with steel or concrete.7 This gives architects immense creative freedom to design innovative and aesthetically striking building facades, structural elements, and interior features.17
• Thermal & Electrical Insulation: Most FRPs are natural insulators. Their low thermal conductivity helps to reduce thermal bridging in building envelopes, contributing directly to improved energy efficiency by reducing the cooling load.7 Their non-conductive nature also makes them an excellent choice for applications where electrical safety is a concern, such as in and around electrical enclosures or rail infrastructure.33
• Fatigue & Creep Resistance: Composite materials demonstrate impressive resistance to fatigue, which is the weakening of a material caused by repeated loading cycles.24 They are also resistant to creep, the tendency of a material to deform permanently under the influence of persistent mechanical stresses. These properties are critical for ensuring the long-term integrity and safety of structures subjected to dynamic or constant loads, such as bridges, floor systems, and wind turbine blades.24

The following table provides a quantitative comparison of these properties, offering an at-a-glance decision-making tool for professionals.

Table 1: Comparative Properties: Advanced Composites vs. Traditional Materials

Property	CFRP (Typical)	GFRP (Typical)	Structural Steel	Reinforced Concrete
Density (kg/m3)	1,600	2,000	7,850	2,400
Tensile Strength (MPa)	600 – 4,000+	500 – 2,000	400 – 550	2 – 5 (Tensile)
Tensile Modulus (GPa)	120 – 240	45 – 70	200	30
Thermal Conductivity (W/mK)	~0.5 – 1.0	~0.3	~50	~1.7
Corrosion Resistance	Excellent	Excellent	Poor (requires protection)	Fair (vulnerable to chlorides)

Data synthesized from sources:.16 Values are indicative and can vary significantly based on specific fiber/matrix combination and manufacturing process.

This table powerfully illustrates the trade-offs. While steel has a high modulus (stiffness), CFRP can offer comparable or higher stiffness at less than a quarter of the weight. Similarly, the tensile strength of composites dwarfs that of concrete, while their thermal conductivity is orders of magnitude lower than steel’s. This data grounds the benefits of composites in the quantitative language of engineering, transforming them from an abstract concept into a compelling material choice.

 

Part 3: Composites in Action: Case Studies from Singapore’s Urban Landscape

 

The true measure of a material’s impact lies not in its theoretical properties but in its real-world application. In Singapore, advanced composites are moving beyond the laboratory and are being deployed in a growing number of landmark projects across the island. 

These case studies provide tangible proof of the benefits discussed previously, demonstrating how composites are solving practical challenges in new construction, infrastructure retrofitting, and the push towards industrialized prefabrication.

 

3.1 Transforming New Structures: Pushing the Boundaries of Design

 

Advanced composites are enabling architects and engineers to create structures that are lighter, more durable, and architecturally more ambitious than ever before. From public infrastructure to unique building components, these materials are making their mark.

 

Facades and Building Envelopes

 

The building envelope is a primary application area for composites, where their combination of light weight, durability, and design flexibility is highly valued. Composite panels, including Aluminium Composite Material (ACM) and various FRP systems, allow for the creation of durable and energy-efficient facades.7 

These panels can be molded into complex shapes, offering architects significant aesthetic freedom while providing the necessary resistance to Singapore’s harsh tropical weather. Crucially, fire-retardant (FR) grades of these panels have been developed to meet the stringent fire safety regulations set by the Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF), addressing a key concern for their use in high-rise buildings.45

 

Infrastructure – The Composite Bridge

 

While Singapore has a robust network of conventional bridges, it has also been a site for innovation in composite bridge technology. A notable example is the SBS Linkway Bridge, a pedestrian crossing that was a pioneering project in its time.46 This structure was the first cable-stayed bridge to utilize a

space truss structure, which consists of concrete upper slabs supported by steel trusses.46 Although a relatively small pedestrian bridge, the project served as a valuable test bed, providing essential data on the design and construction of this innovative composite system.46 This local precedent connects to the broader global trend of using FRP for bridge construction and repair. 

The material’s corrosion resistance is a major advantage for infrastructure owner-operators like the Land Transport Authority (LTA), as it promises a longer service life with reduced maintenance, especially for bridges in coastal or industrial environments. Furthermore, the light weight of FRP decks and components allows for rapid installation, minimizing traffic disruption during construction or rehabilitation—a critical factor in a dense city like Singapore.38

 

Vertical Innovation – The World’s First Composite Lift

 

Perhaps one of the most striking examples of composite innovation in Singapore’s BE sector is the development of the world’s first composite lift by the Singapore Lift Company (SLC), a joint venture that includes major industry players Woh Hup and Far East Organisation.44 This project represents a fundamental rethinking of a core building component.

The SLC lift cabin is constructed from lightweight composite materials, including Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Polymers (CFRPs), Glass-Fiber-Reinforced Polymers (GFRPs), and bio-derived polymers.44 The results are dramatic: the composite cabin weighs a mere 150 kg, a staggering ten times lighter than a conventional steel lift of similar capacity, which weighs around 1,500 kg.44

This massive weight reduction creates a cascade of benefits that could disrupt conventional building design. The lightweight nature of the lift means it requires significantly less structural support from the building. This can lead to a smaller building core, freeing up valuable net lettable or saleable floor area—a powerful economic incentive for developers in land-scarce Singapore. 

The simplified structural requirements and off-site assembly also make installation remarkably fast, potentially reducing the process from five days to just one.44 This technology is particularly promising for retrofitting lifts into older buildings that lack existing lift shafts, as the minimal structural load makes it easier to integrate the system without requiring extensive and costly strengthening of the existing structure. The lift has received certification from Europe’s Liftinstituut, with certification from the Singapore BCA reported to be underway, paving the way for its commercial adoption.44

 

3.2 Breathing New Life into Existing Buildings: The Retrofitting Revolution

 

As Singapore’s building stock ages, the need for effective and efficient repair and strengthening solutions becomes paramount. FRP composites have emerged as a leading technology for structural retrofitting, offering a high-strength, low-impact method to extend the service life of existing assets.

 

Case Study: Strengthening RC Slabs with Openings

 

A unique and highly valuable case study on FRP retrofitting was conducted on an actual multi-story reinforced concrete (RC) building in Singapore that was scheduled for demolition.28 The field test aimed to address a common and critical problem in building upgrades: when new openings are cut into existing RC slabs to accommodate mechanical and electrical (M&E) services, the removal of concrete and steel reinforcement severely weakens the slab’s structural capacity.28

The research team tested three different CFRP strengthening techniques to restore the slab’s lost flexural capacity:

1. Externally Bonded (EB) CFRP Plates: Carbon fiber plates were bonded to the underside of the slab.
2. Near-Surface Mounted (NSM) CFRP Strips: Narrow carbon fiber strips were inserted into grooves cut into the concrete cover.
3. EB CFRP Plates with Mechanical Anchors: CFRP plates were bonded and then mechanically fastened to the slab using special CFRP anchors.28

The results provided clear, real-world evidence of the efficacy of these methods. All three techniques successfully increased the load-carrying capacity of the weakened slabs. The NSM technique proved more effective than the simple EB plate bonding, as it provided better anchorage.28 However, the most successful solution was the use of

EB plates combined with CFRP anchors. This mechanical anchorage prevented the premature debonding (peeling off) of the CFRP plate from the concrete surface, a common failure mode in EB systems. This allowed the composite to develop its full tensile strength, enabling the slab to be restored to its full, original flexural capacity.28 This case study provides an invaluable, locally-validated blueprint for engineers tackling similar strengthening challenges.

 

Public Housing – HDB’s Home Improvement Programme (HIP)

 

The HDB’s Home Improvement Programme (HIP) is one of the largest and most systematic upgrading initiatives in Singapore, targeting aging public housing blocks to resolve common maintenance issues.53 A primary component of the HIP is the

repair of spalling concrete, a direct consequence of steel reinforcement corrosion in older flats.53

Currently, the HIP incorporates some modern materials, such as Unplasticised Polyvinyl Chloride (UPVC) for waste stacks and laminated timber composite doors.53 However, there exists a significant and largely untapped opportunity to integrate more advanced composite solutions, like FRP wraps, into the core of the HIP framework. FRP systems are a proven, durable, and efficient method for repairing and strengthening degraded concrete structures.26

Adopting FRP wrap as a standard option for spalling concrete repair within the HIP could yield substantial long-term benefits for HDB. The superior durability and corrosion resistance of FRP would ensure a much longer lifespan for the repairs compared to traditional patch-repair methods, reducing the need for repeated maintenance cycles in the future. 

This aligns perfectly with the BCA’s “Design for Maintainability” (DfM) principles, which emphasize minimizing future upkeep costs.57 Furthermore, the speed and efficiency of FRP application could potentially shorten the time required for in-flat works, minimizing inconvenience to residents. This presents a compelling opportunity to leverage advanced materials to enhance the value and sustainability of Singapore’s largest-scale housing renewal program.

 

3.3 The Prefabrication Revolution: DfMA and PPVC

 

The government’s push for DfMA is accelerating the use of advanced and engineered materials in both industrial and residential projects. These methods rely on factory-produced components, where quality control is higher and the use of innovative materials is easier to manage.

 

Industrial Scale – JTC’s Advanced Facilities

 

JTC Corporation, as the master planner of Singapore’s industrial estates, is a key driver of innovative and productive construction methods. A prime example is the JTC Space @ Tuas Avenue 1 project, an integrated industrial facility that includes a multi-user factory, amenity center, and a workers’ dormitory.58 This project made extensive use of a hybrid

Prefabricated Prefinished Volumetric Construction (PPVC) system.

Notably, the project utilized an advanced composite concrete, DURA Ultra-High Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete (UHPFRC), for the external walls of the 228 PPVC modules.58 The use of UHPFRC provided a durable, high-strength, and lightweight solution perfectly suited for the prefabricated modules. This case study demonstrates the successful application of advanced composite materials at an industrial scale, aligning with the national push for higher productivity. 

JTC’s role extends beyond its own projects; its specialized industrial parks like JTC Launchpad @ One-North and JTC Space @ Tuas also serve as hubs for deep-tech companies, including graphene composite specialist 2DM and advanced materials firm MADE Advanced Materials, fostering an ecosystem of innovation.59

 

Residential Scale – HDB’s Productivity Drive

 

HDB is a global leader in the use of precast technology, with approximately 70% of the structural concrete in its projects being prefabricated off-site.6 While HDB’s systems are predominantly concrete-based, the agency actively incorporates engineered, lightweight materials to enhance productivity and quality. For instance, HDB uses

drywall systems for internal bedroom partitions and Lightweight Precast Concrete Panels (LPCP) in wet areas like kitchens and toilets.55 These systems are faster and less labor-intensive to install than traditional brick-and-mortar walls.

HDB is also a major adopter of PPVC, having pioneered the use of concrete Prefabricated Bathroom Units (PBUs) and progressively rolling out full volumetric construction for its Build-To-Order (BTO) projects.6 The agency targeted constructing around 33% of its new flats launched in 2019 using the PPVC method.6 

While these modules are primarily concrete, the underlying principle of off-site manufacturing and the use of lighter-weight internal components demonstrate a clear strategic direction that is highly compatible with the future integration of more advanced composite materials.

 

Part 4: The Ecosystem of Innovation: Regulation and Research

 

The successful adoption of advanced materials does not happen in a vacuum. It requires a supportive “soft infrastructure” of clear regulations, internationally recognized standards, and a robust research and development (R&D) ecosystem. In Singapore, a maturing framework is in place, providing pathways for compliance while simultaneously driving innovation to meet the nation’s specific needs.

 

4.1 Navigating the Regulatory Framework: BCA and SCDF

 

For any new construction material to gain traction, engineers and architects must have a clear and confident path to regulatory approval. The Building and Construction Authority (BCA) provides this through its “Approved Document,” which outlines “Acceptable Solutions” that are deemed to satisfy the Building Control Regulations.62

Crucially, this document explicitly incorporates design guides for the use of Externally Bonded Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) Systems for structural strengthening.64 By referencing established international standards such as the

Concrete Society’s Technical Report 55 (TR55) and the American Concrete Institute’s ACI 440.2R, the BCA provides a clear, recognized, and defensible basis for design.63 This gives structural engineers the confidence to specify FRP systems, knowing that they are following a pre-approved methodology. The regulations also provide acceptable solutions for composite steel and concrete structures based on Eurocode 4 (SS EN 1994).66

While the BCA provides a pathway for structural use, the greatest regulatory challenge for polymer-based composites lies in fire safety. The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) maintains a stringent Fire Code, which governs the fire performance of all building materials. 

The Fire Code 2023, under Clause 3.15, mandates that all elements of a structure must be constructed of non-combustible materials.67 It also places strict limitations on the use of plastic materials in walls, ceilings, and finishes.67 Since most conventional polymer matrices in FRPs are combustible, this presents a significant hurdle for their widespread application, particularly in structural roles or as extensive cladding on high-rise buildings.

This strict fire safety regulation, however, does not act as a dead end for composites. Instead, it functions as a powerful catalyst for targeted innovation. The clear and unyielding market requirement for a material that possesses the structural advantages of composites but also meets the SCDF’s non-combustibility or fire-retardancy standards has created a powerful incentive for R&D. 

This dynamic is visible in both academia and industry. Research teams at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) are actively working on developing fire-retardant epoxy composites specifically for construction applications.68 Concurrently, a Singapore-based research team has developed a proprietary fire-retardant FRP system that utilizes a modified epoxy adhesive. This innovation reportedly improves the material’s flammability from an unclassified level to a

V-0 rating under the UL-94 standard, a significant achievement.70 This system is pending full fire testing and evaluation by the BCA’s Building Innovation Panel, which is designed to expedite the regulatory clearance for new technologies.4 

This demonstrates a responsive and dynamic ecosystem where stringent regulation, rather than stifling progress, directly stimulates the creation of a new generation of safer, compliant composite materials tailored specifically for the demanding Singapore market.

The following table serves as a practical reference guide, consolidating the key standards and codes that professionals must navigate when using composite materials in Singapore.

Table 2: Key Singapore Standards and Codes for Composite Material Use

Standard/Code	Issuing Body / Reference	Application Area
SS EN 1994	Enterprise Singapore	Design of composite steel and concrete structures.
ACI 440.2R-08	American Concrete Institute (referenced by BCA)	Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems for strengthening concrete structures.
Concrete Society TR55	The Concrete Society (UK) (referenced by BCA)	Design guidance for strengthening concrete structures using fibre composite materials.
SCDF Fire Code 2023 (Clause 3.15)	Singapore Civil Defence Force	Specifies requirements for non-combustible materials for structural elements and limits on plastic materials.
EN 13501-1	European Standard (referenced for product testing)	Fire classification of construction products and building elements, often used to certify the fire retardancy of composite panels.
BS 8414 / NFPA 285	British Standard / US Standard (referenced for system testing)	Intermediate-scale multi-story fire tests used to evaluate the performance of an entire facade system, including composite panels.

Data synthesized from sources:.45

 

4.2 The R&D Powerhouses: NUS, NTU, and A*STAR

 

The innovation spurred by regulatory and market needs is nurtured within Singapore’s world-class research institutions. These R&D powerhouses provide the scientific underpinning for the development and application of next-generation materials.

• Nanyang Technological University (NTU): NTU has established itself as a leading center for composite materials research in Singapore. The School of Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) has a specific research cluster dedicated to “Defense / Functional Composite Materials”.71 Research at NTU is highly applied and directly addresses key industry challenges. One major focus area is the development of
  fire-resistant fiber-reinforced composites, with job postings for researchers explicitly seeking expertise in improving the thermal insulation and flame retardancy of epoxy-based composites for construction.68 Another significant area of research, led by faculty like Professor Kang-Hai Tan, involves investigating the mechanical behavior of
  Engineered Cementitious Composites (ECC). This research examines how ECC performs under extreme loading conditions, such as impact and progressive collapse scenarios, providing crucial data for its use in high-resilience structures.39
• National University of Singapore (NUS): Within NUS’s College of Design and Engineering, the Centre for Advanced Materials and Structures (CAMS) is a key hub for research relevant to the BE sector.72 “Composite materials and structures” is listed as a primary research theme under their “Future solutions” pillar.73 While CAMS’s focus is broad, encompassing areas like biomimetic structures and self-healing materials, it also has specific projects on topics like
  lightweight high-strength steel-concrete composite modular buildings and the digital fabrication of concrete.72 This work, combined with research on upcycling local waste into sustainable construction materials, positions NUS to contribute significantly to the development of next-generation, sustainable composite systems.73
• Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR): As Singapore’s lead public sector R&D agency, A*STAR plays a crucial role in translating scientific discovery into economic value. The Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (IMRE) has built strong capabilities in polymeric and composite materials since its establishment in 1997.75 IMRE’s research is highly interdisciplinary, with projects that include developing smart sensors for structural monitoring and pioneering methods to transform waste materials, such as plastic bottles and food waste, into high-value polymers and other useful compounds.75 This focus on waste valorization and smart materials is critical for developing the sustainable and intelligent composites of the future.

Together, these three institutions form a powerful R&D triangle, providing the talent, facilities, and fundamental research needed to support the BE sector’s transition towards advanced materials. Their work ensures that Singapore is not just a consumer of composite technology, but also a creator of innovative solutions tailored to its own unique challenges.

 

Part 5: The Business Case: A Lifecycle Approach to Cost and Value

 

For any new material to achieve widespread adoption in the cost-sensitive construction industry, it must present a compelling business case. While advanced composites often face the perception of having a high initial cost compared to traditional materials like steel and concrete 33, a sophisticated economic analysis reveals a much more nuanced and favorable picture. 

By shifting the focus from the upfront purchase price to the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) and Lifecycle Cost (LCC), the true value proposition of composites becomes clear.

 

5.1 Moving Beyond Upfront Costs

 

A simple material-to-material cost comparison is fundamentally flawed because it ignores the cascading effects that a material’s properties have on the entire construction value chain. The lightweight nature of advanced composites is a prime example of how initial material expense is offset by significant downstream savings.

This process begins at the design stage. A lighter superstructure, made possible by composite components, exerts less dead load on the building’s support system.42 This directly translates to smaller, simpler, and less material-intensive foundations, generating the first wave of cost savings in terms of concrete and steel reinforcement.

The savings continue into the logistics and on-site execution phases. Lighter components are cheaper to transport from the prefabrication facility to the construction site, requiring smaller trucks and consuming less fuel.9 Once on-site, the advantages become even more pronounced. The reduced weight allows for the use of smaller, less expensive cranes for lifting and installation.10 

Assembly can be performed by smaller crews, reducing direct labor costs. The speed of installation is also significantly faster; for example, a composite lift cabin can be installed in a fraction of the time required for a steel one.44 This acceleration of the construction schedule is a major economic benefit, as it reduces project overheads, shortens financing periods, and allows the developer to begin generating revenue from the asset sooner.

Therefore, the “true” cost of using a composite component is not merely its ticket price. It is the net cost after subtracting these often-overlooked savings in foundations, transportation, on-site equipment, labor, and project duration. When viewed through this holistic lens, the economic argument for composites becomes far more persuasive.

 

5.2 Lifecycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) in the Singapore Context

 

The economic advantages of composites extend far beyond the construction phase. Their exceptional durability and corrosion resistance lead to a longer service life with significantly lower maintenance and repair costs.7 To quantify this long-term value, a formal Lifecycle Cost Analysis (LCCA) is required. An exemplary LCCA study, highly relevant to Singapore, was conducted by researchers, including a team from NTU, on the use of

Engineered Cementitious Composite (ECC) precast pavement.40

This study provided a rigorous comparison between a proposed ECC precast pavement system and a traditional cast-in-place Portland cement concrete (PCC) pavement over a 40 to 50-year analysis period.40 The methodology was comprehensive, factoring in agency costs (initial construction, maintenance, rehabilitation) and, crucially,

user costs.

User costs, particularly traffic delay costs, represent the economic impact of construction activities on the public. In a dense and highly connected urban environment like Singapore, road closures for construction or repair can lead to massive, quantifiable economic losses from wasted time and fuel. 

To accurately measure this, the researchers used a sophisticated microscopic traffic simulation tool (VISSIM) to model traffic flow and delays for a real-world case study area in Clementi during a simulated lane closure.40

The findings of the LCCA were striking. As expected, the initial construction cost of the ECC precast pavement was significantly higher than the cast-in-place option (estimated at 400 SGD/m² versus 165 SGD/m²).40 However, when the entire lifecycle was considered, the ECC pavement was often the more economical solution. The key differentiating factor was the user delay cost. 

The rapid, overnight installation of the precast ECC panels resulted in minimal public disruption. In contrast, the traditional cast-in-place method required a lengthy 10-day curing period, leading to prolonged lane closures.40 The economic cost of this disruption was enormous, accounting for a staggering

63% to 85% of the total lifecycle cost of the traditional pavement option.40

This study powerfully demonstrates the immense economic value of time in an urban setting like Singapore. By enabling rapid installation and minimizing public disruption, advanced composite systems like precast ECC offer a solution that, despite a higher upfront investment, can deliver superior long-term economic performance. 

This provides a data-driven justification for infrastructure authorities like the LTA to specify such materials for projects on critical transport arteries where minimizing disruption is a top priority.

 

5.3 The Full Value Proposition

 

Synthesizing these analyses reveals a multi-faceted business case for advanced composite materials in Singapore’s construction sector. The decision to adopt these materials should not be based on a narrow comparison of initial material costs, but on a holistic assessment of their total value proposition across the entire project lifecycle. This value is derived from a combination of factors:

1. Reduced Construction Costs: While the material itself may be more expensive, its lightweight nature leads to cascading savings in foundations, logistics, and on-site labor and equipment, lowering the overall capital expenditure.10
2. Lowered Lifecycle Maintenance Costs: Superior durability and resistance to corrosion and weathering mean that composite components require far less maintenance and have a longer service life, drastically reducing long-term repair and replacement costs.7
3. Minimized Disruption Costs: The suitability of composites for prefabrication and rapid assembly significantly shortens construction and repair times, minimizing the immense and quantifiable economic costs of disruption to traffic and business, particularly for infrastructure projects.40
4. Enhanced Asset Value: The use of composites can contribute directly to achieving higher tiers of the BCA Green Mark certification, particularly through reductions in both operational and embodied carbon. Buildings with higher Green Mark ratings can command higher property values and rental yields, providing a direct return on investment for developers.

When all these factors are considered, advanced composites present a compelling economic argument. They offer a pathway to building faster, more sustainably, and more resiliently, with a total cost of ownership that is often more favorable than that of traditional materials.

 

Part 6: The Future Trajectory: Next-Generation Composites and the Circular Economy

 

The adoption of advanced composites in Singapore’s construction industry is not a static event but an evolving journey. As the sector gains experience with current-generation materials, a new wave of innovation is on the horizon, promising even greater performance and sustainability. These future developments, combined with a global shift towards a circular economy, will define the next phase of the material revolution in Singapore’s Built Environment.

 

6.1 Emerging Material Innovations

 

The field of materials science is continuously advancing, producing new composites with enhanced capabilities tailored for the challenges of the future.

• Bio-Composites and Sustainable Materials: A significant trend is the development of composites derived from renewable resources. These “bio-composites” utilize natural fibers like bamboo and hemp as reinforcement, and bio-based resins as a matrix.77 These materials offer a much lower carbon footprint compared to their synthetic counterparts. In Singapore, this is an active area of research. The
  ETH Future Cities Laboratory is specifically investigating the potential of new bamboo composite materials to replace steel reinforcement in structural concrete applications.79 Given bamboo’s rapid growth and high tensile strength, this research could lead to a truly sustainable, locally relevant construction material.79
• Smart Composites and Structural Health Monitoring (SHM): The next frontier in structural engineering is the integration of sensing capabilities directly into materials. “Smart composites” are being developed by embedding sensors, such as fiber optic strands, within the composite laminate during manufacturing.81 These integrated sensors can provide real-time data on the stress, strain, and temperature of a structural component throughout its service life. This enables continuous
  Structural Health Monitoring (SHM), allowing asset owners to move from a schedule-based inspection regime to a predictive maintenance model. They can detect potential damage or degradation early, address issues before they become critical, and optimize the maintenance of critical infrastructure like bridges and tunnels.81
• Advanced Manufacturing and 3D Printing: The way composites are made is also being revolutionized. Additive Manufacturing, or 3D printing, is enabling the creation of highly complex and structurally optimized composite parts. Technologies like continuous fiber 3D printing allow for the precise placement of reinforcing fibers (such as carbon or glass) within a thermoplastic matrix, following the exact load paths determined by computer analysis.42 This process, championed by companies like Anisoprint, can produce parts that are significantly stronger and lighter than those made with traditional methods, opening up new possibilities for bespoke, high-performance components in construction.42

 

6.2 Closing the Loop: Composites and the Circular Economy

 

Beyond new materials, a paradigm shift is occurring in how we think about the entire lifecycle of buildings. The linear “take-make-dispose” economic model is being challenged by the concept of a circular economy, where waste is eliminated and resources are kept in use for as long as possible. In construction, this translates to viewing buildings not as disposable assets, but as valuable “material banks”.83

The key enabler for this vision is Design for Disassembly (DfD). This is a design philosophy that prioritizes the end-of-life scenario from the very beginning. DfD involves constructing buildings from modular components joined with reversible connections, such as bolts and mechanical fasteners, rather than permanent chemical bonds like adhesives or cast-in-situ concrete.83 

This ensures that at the end of the building’s service life, it can be easily and non-destructively taken apart, and its components can be salvaged for reuse in new projects or efficiently recycled.

Advanced composites are exceptionally well-suited to a DfD approach. Their use in prefabricated, modular panels and structural elements aligns perfectly with the principles of modular construction. Their light weight makes the process of disassembly safer and easier, and their high durability ensures that the salvaged components retain a high residual value for reuse.83

A powerful synergy exists between Singapore’s current policy push for DfMA and the future goal of a circular economy. The primary driver for DfMA today is to improve on-site productivity.4 However, by encouraging the industry to build with discrete, factory-made modules and components, the DfMA initiative is inadvertently creating a building stock that is inherently more suited for future disassembly. 

The skills, logistics chains, and manufacturing capabilities being developed for DfMA are the very same ones that will be required for a mature DfD ecosystem. In this sense, Singapore’s investment in productivity-led prefabrication today is simultaneously laying the essential groundwork for the circular construction models of tomorrow.

 

6.3 Outlook for the Singapore Market

 

The trajectory for advanced composite materials in Singapore’s construction sector is one of accelerating adoption and integration. The powerful confluence of top-down government policy (driving productivity and sustainability), persistent economic pressures (labor shortages and rising costs), and continuous technological advancement is creating an environment where composites are transitioning from a niche material to a mainstream solution.

In the near term, growth will likely be concentrated in applications where the value proposition is most clear:

• Structural retrofitting and repair, where the lightweight and corrosion-resistant properties of FRPs offer a clear advantage for aging infrastructure.
• High-performance facades and building envelopes, where composites provide design flexibility and contribute to Green Mark energy efficiency targets.
• Prefabricated components (DfMA/PPVC), where their light weight is essential for meeting productivity mandates in public and private projects.

Looking further ahead, the adoption of next-generation bio-composites and smart materials, coupled with the principles of the circular economy and Design for Disassembly, will further embed composites into the fabric of Singapore’s BE sector. The journey will require continued investment in R&D, skills development, and the streamlining of regulatory pathways, particularly for fire safety. However, the direction is clear: advanced composite materials are set to play an indispensable role in building a smarter, greener, and more resilient Singapore for generations to come.

 

Conclusion: A Call to Action for the Built Environment Sector

 

The evidence presented in this report leads to an unequivocal conclusion: advanced composite materials are not merely an alternative to traditional steel and concrete; they are strategic tools that directly address the core challenges of Singapore’s Built Environment sector. Their adoption is a critical enabler of the nation’s vision for a future that is simultaneously more productive, sustainable, and resilient. 

The synthesis of their benefits—from the on-site manpower savings of DfMA and the lifecycle value demonstrated in rigorous cost analyses, to the long-term durability in a harsh tropical climate and the alignment with the highest tiers of the BCA Green Mark scheme—presents a compelling case for their accelerated integration into the industry.

This material revolution, however, cannot be realized by any single stakeholder group. It requires a concerted, collective effort across the entire value chain. Therefore, this report concludes with a call to action for the key players who will shape Singapore’s future skyline.

• For Developers and Asset Owners: It is imperative to look beyond the initial, line-item cost of materials and embrace a more sophisticated, lifecycle value perspective. The true economic benefit of composites is realized through reduced construction time, lower long-term maintenance, minimized disruption costs, and the enhanced asset value associated with superior sustainability and resilience. Investing in these materials is an investment in the long-term profitability and future-readiness of your portfolio.
• For Architects and Engineers: The unique, anisotropic nature of composites demands a new way of thinking. The profession must move beyond simply selecting materials to actively “designing the material” itself. This requires upskilling in composite engineering principles and fostering earlier, more integrated collaboration with material scientists and manufacturers to unlock the full potential for structural optimization and architectural innovation.
• For Contractors and Builders: The future of construction in Singapore is off-site. Investing in the skills, training, and technology required to handle and install prefabricated composite systems efficiently is no longer a choice but a necessity for survival and growth. Mastery of these new methods will be the key differentiator in a market increasingly driven by productivity mandates.
• For Policymakers and Regulatory Bodies: The government has already laid a strong foundation through its visionary Industry Transformation Map and support for R&D. The path forward requires continued effort to streamline the regulatory approval process for new materials, particularly by developing clear standards and testing protocols for fire safety. Continued support for skills development through institutions like the BCA Academy and its partners will be essential to ensure the workforce is ready for this technological shift.

The transition to advanced composite materials is more than a technical upgrade; it is a strategic evolution. By working together to embrace these innovative materials, the stakeholders of Singapore’s Built Environment sector can collectively build a future that is not only structurally sound but also economically vibrant and environmentally responsible, securing the nation’s legacy as a leader in urban solutions.

Works cited

1. Facing the Challenges of Singapore’s Construction Industry – Ross Sutherland, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.rosssutherland.co.uk/facing-the-challenges-of-singapores-construction-industry/
2. Singapore Construction Labor Market Shortfall: Solutions, accessed July 12, 2025, https://marketresearchsingapore.com/insights/articles/singapore-construction-labor-market-shortfall-solutions
3. Singapore’s labor challenge requires all hands on deck – TNGlobal – TechNode Global, accessed July 12, 2025, https://technode.global/2024/10/21/singapores-labor-challenge-requires-all-hands-on-deck/
4. The Productivity Challenge: How construction firms are doing more with less | BuildSG Magazine, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/buildsg-emag/articles/the-productivity-challenge-how-construction-firms-are-doing-more-with-less
5. Singapore’s public housing pilots advanced construction technologies; HDB targets 40% site productivity improvement by 2030, accessed July 12, 2025, https://seac.tradelinkmedia.biz/publications/7/news/4153
6. Prefabrication Technology – HDB, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.hdb.gov.sg/about-us/research-and-innovation/construction-productivity/prefabrication-technology
7. The Ultimate Guide to Composite Panels in Singapore: Applications and Benefits, accessed July 12, 2025, https://roofing.com.sg/the-ultimate-guide-to-composite-panels-in-singapore-applications-and-benefits/
8. Fibre-Reinforced Polymer (FRP) in Civil Engineering – UEL Research Repository – University of East London, accessed July 12, 2025, https://repository.uel.ac.uk/download/1c105b4c0c0bbb4eb733fee32a6c5ba7fed9fd042a90ae3de1296889b39497c5/2083002/Fibre-Reinforced%20Polymer%20%28FRP%29%20in%20Civil%20Engineering%20by%20Jawed%20Qureshi%202022.pdf
9. Exploring Composite Building Materials in Construction, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.jlbuilding.com/blog/composite-building-materials-construction/
10. Advanced Composites Since 1971 – About – Dynaglass, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.dynaglass.com/about
11. 222 questions with answers in COMPOSITE STRUCTURES | Science topic – ResearchGate, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/topic/Composite-Structures
12. About BCA – Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed July 12, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/about-us/about-bca
13. MEDIA FACTSHEETS ON INITIATIVES TO SUPPORT TRANSFORMATION IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT SECTOR – Ministry of National Development (MND), accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.mnd.gov.sg/docs/default-source/mnd-documents/cos-2024/bca-media-factsheet.pdf?sfvrsn=4682779e_0
14. The Engineer’s Definitive Guide to Life Cycle Assessment, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.aectechnicalsg.com/lca-buildings-singapore-whole-life-carbon/
15. Understanding the Role of High-Performance Facades in Singapore’s Green Building Vision, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.sgbc.sg/sgbc-ll-technoform-2025-1/
16. Role of building material in thermal comfort in tropical climates – A review – ResearchGate, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281280248_Role_of_building_material_in_thermal_comfort_in_tropical_climates_-_A_review
17. Composite Construction Materials: Types, Benefits & Applications – Brick & Bolt, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.bricknbolt.com/blogs-and-articles/construction-guide/composite-construction-materials
18. 4-questions-to-ask-a-composite-material-supplier – NitProcomposites, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.nitprocomposites.com/blog/4-questions-to-ask-a-composite-material-supplier
19. Advanced Composite Materials and Solutions, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.gurit.com/
20. Construction Materials Singapore | Resysta Building Products, accessed July 12, 2025, https://resysta-asia.com/singapore-building-products/
21. Longevity – National Population and Talent Division, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.population.gov.sg/our-population/population-trends/longevity/
22. Innovative Materials in Tropical Architecture: Balancing Sustainability and Aesthetics, accessed July 12, 2025, https://parametric-architecture.com/materials-in-tropical-architecture/
23. Composite Materials for Structural Reinforcement (FRP – Ajer.org, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.ajer.org/papers/Vol-14-issue-2/14024247.pdf
24. Composite Materials: All About Their Properties, Uses & Types – SendCutSend, accessed July 12, 2025, https://sendcutsend.com/blog/what-is-a-composite-material/
25. Tropical Hardwoods vs Composite Decks – Brazilian Lumber Los Angeles, accessed July 12, 2025, https://brazilianlumberlosangeles.com/tropical-hardwoods-vs-composite-deck/
26. Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Concrete Structures – QuakeWrap, accessed July 12, 2025, https://quakewrap.com/frp%20papers/GuideforDesignofExternallyBondedFRP-1.pdf
27. Strengthening of Concrete Structures Using FRP Composites, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.structuremag.org/article/strengthening-of-concrete-structures-using-frp-composites/
28. Case Study on the Restoration of Flexural Capacity of Continuous One-Way RC Slabs with Cutouts | Journal of Composites for Construction | Vol 15, No 6 – ASCE Library, accessed July 12, 2025, https://ascelibrary.org/doi/abs/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CC.1943-5614.0000232
29. UNIT 1 INTRODUCTION ANDCOMPOSITE FUNDAMENTALS – Sathyabama, accessed July 12, 2025, https://sist.sathyabama.ac.in/sist_coursematerial/uploads/SAE1401.pdf
30. (PDF) Properties of Composite Materials – ResearchGate, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347980804_Properties_of_Composite_Materials
31. Advanced composite materials Engineering, accessed July 12, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_composite_materials_(engineering)
32. ntrs.nasa.gov, accessed July 12, 2025, https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19760005027/downloads/19760005027.pdf
33. Frequently Asked Questions about Advanced Composites Inc., accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.advancedcomposites.com/composites-manufacturing/frequently-asked-questions/
34. Structural Retrofitting Using Fiber Reinforced Polymers – DSpace@MIT, accessed July 12, 2025, http://dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/handle/1721.1/73784/810191634-MIT.pdf?sequence=2
35. Advancements in Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites: A Comprehensive Analysis – PMC, accessed July 12, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10780509/
36. 1 CHAPTER 15 COMPOSITES 15.1 Fiber Reinforced Polymers 15.2 What are Polymers? 15.3 FRP Fiber Orientation 15.4 FRP Fabrica – Naval Academy, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.usna.edu/NAOE/_files/documents/Courses/EN380/Course_Notes/Ch15_Composites.pdf
37. Chapter 7: Advanced Composite Material – ResearchGate, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Mahesh-Nagarkar/post/Is_there_any_requirement_of_finish_of_fibres_such_as_carbon_Kevalr_in_the_aerospace_industry/attachment/5a6750c9b53d2f0bba4d3b6e/AS%3A585981686202368%401516720329177/download/ama_ch07.pdf
38. Advanced Composites in Bridge Construction and Repair – National Academic Digital Library of Ethiopia, accessed July 12, 2025, http://ndl.ethernet.edu.et/bitstream/123456789/48665/1/199.pdf
39. Mechanical Behaviour of Engineered Cementitious Composites …, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284763883_Mechanical_Behaviour_of_Engineered_Cementitious_Composites_under_Quasi-Static_and_High_Strain_Rate_Applications
40. Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Engineered Cementitious Composite …, accessed July 12, 2025, https://iccp-portal.com/index.php/proceedings/article/download/351/159/887
41. Questions to Ask First – Explore Composites!, accessed July 12, 2025, https://explorecomposites.com/articles/design-for-composites/questions-to-ask-first/
42. Continuous fiber 3D printing for manufacturing of optimal composites, accessed July 12, 2025, https://anisoprint.com/
43. Reimagining Architecture with FRP Composites, accessed July 12, 2025, https://acmanet.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/A2-Samer_A-2021-ACMA-CI-Tech-Day-Reimagining-Architecutre-June-2021.pdf
44. Building the world’s infrastructure with composites – Plastics and …, accessed July 12, 2025, http://plasticsandrubberasia.com/feb2017/materials7.html
45. Fire Retardancy and ALUCOBOND®, accessed July 12, 2025, https://alucobond.com.sg/media/2015/02/FR-brochure-jan16.pdf
46. Steel truss to concrete connection at the ski jump in Innsbruck – ResearchGate, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299806158_Steel_truss_to_concrete_connection_at_the_ski_jump_in_Innsbruck
47. An Innovative Composite Pedestrian Bridge, Singapore, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.2749/101686698780489441
48. ugv unmanned ground: Topics by Science.gov, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.science.gov/topicpages/u/ugv+unmanned+ground
49. Fiber Reinforced Polymer Builds Better Bridges and Infrastructure – Composites One, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.compositesone.com/fiber-reinforced-polymer-builds-better-bridges-and-infrastructure/
50. From Uses to Field Services: Learn About FRP for Infrastructure, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.creativecompositesgroup.com/blog/uses-to-field-services-learn-about-frp-for-infrastructure
51. Case Study on the Restoration of Flexural Capacity of Continuous One-Way RC Slabs with Cutouts | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/275183458_Case_Study_on_the_Restoration_of_Flexural_Capacity_of_Continuous_One-Way_RC_Slabs_with_Cutouts
52. Case Study on the Restoration of Flexural Capacity of Continuous One-Way RC Slabs with Cutouts – ASCE Library, accessed July 12, 2025, https://ascelibrary.org/doi/pdf/10.1061/%28ASCE%29CC.1943-5614.0000232
53. Home Improvement Programme (HIP) – HDB, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.hdb.gov.sg/residential/living-in-an-hdb-flat/sers-and-upgrading-programmes/upgrading-programmes/types/home-improvement-programme-hip
54. 29000 older HDB flats to be upgraded in latest round of Home Improvement Programme, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/29000-older-hdb-flats-to-be-upgraded-in-latest-round-of-home-improvement-programme
55. Material Technology – HDB, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.hdb.gov.sg/about-us/research-and-innovation/construction-productivity/material-technology
56. Lecturers:, accessed July 12, 2025, https://corenet.gov.sg/einfo/bcaevents/SCI_Concrete_Courses.pdf
57. Green Mark 2021 EXISTING BUILDINGS TECHNICAL GUIDE – Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed July 12, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/docs/default-source/bca-awards-2020/mt-section-eb-technical-guide-(version1-2).pdf?sfvrsn=a06e08a9_0
58. Singapore Project – JTC Space@ Tuas Avenue 1 – DURA® Technology Sdn Bhd, accessed July 12, 2025, https://dura.com.my/projects/singapore-project-jtc-space-tuas-avenue-1/
59. MADE Advanced Materials 2025 Company Profile – PitchBook, accessed July 12, 2025, https://pitchbook.com/profiles/company/435686-68
60. Sojitz Invests in Singapore’s 2D Materials Pte. Ltd. to Enter the Graphene Industry, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.sojitz.com/en/news/article/20210624.html
61. Bralco Advanced Materials Pte Ltd – Space Tech Expo USA, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.spacetechexpo.com/exhibitor-list/exhibitor/?boothid=a3RUK0000000VYT2A2
62. BCA – Approved Document (Acceptable Solutions) | PDF | Stairs | Structural Steel – Scribd, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/115884315/BCA-Approved-Document-Acceptable-Solutions
63. Approved Document – BuiltSearch Code, accessed July 12, 2025, https://code.builtsearch.com/codes/approved-document
64. BCA Standard Singapore PDF | PDF | Construction Aggregate | Concrete – Scribd, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.scribd.com/document/338924670/BCA-Standard-Singapore-pdf
65. Dear Sir/Madam AMENDMENTS TO APPROVED DOCUMENT As part of our 3-year review of the rules and regulations, we have reviewed and u – CORENET X, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.corenet.gov.sg/einfo/Uploads/Circulars/CBCA090504.pdf
66. Building Control (Temporary Buildings) Regulations 2018 – Singapore Statutes Online, accessed July 12, 2025, https://sso.agc.gov.sg/SL/BCA1989-S807-2018?ValidDate=20190301&ProvIds=Sc2-
67. Clause 3.15 Materials for Construction – SCDF, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.scdf.gov.sg/fire-safety-services-listing/fire-code-2023/table-of-content/chapter-3-structural-fire-precautions/clause-3.15-materials-for-construction
68. Project Officer (Fiber Reinforced Composites) – Myworkdayjobs.com, accessed July 12, 2025, https://ntu.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/Careers/job/Project-Officer–Fiber-Reinforced-Composites-_R00020951
69. Research Fellow / Research Associate / Project Officer (Fiber Reinforced Composites), accessed July 12, 2025, https://ntu.wd3.myworkdayjobs.com/en-US/Careers/job/Research-Fellow—Research-Associate—Project-Officer–Fiber-Reinforced-Composites-_R00018395
70. Fire Retardant Fibre Reinforced Polymer with Aerogel Jacket for Green Buildings – IPI Singapore, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.ipi-singapore.org/tech-offer/download-pdf/174896
71. Research | School of Materials Science and Engineering | NTU Singapore, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.ntu.edu.sg/mse/research
72. Research Centres – Civil and Environmental Engineering | NUS, accessed July 12, 2025, https://cde.nus.edu.sg/cee/research/research-centres/
73. Centre for Advanced Materials and Structures – Civil and Environmental Engineering | NUS, accessed July 12, 2025, https://cde.nus.edu.sg/cee/research/research-centres/centre-for-advanced-materials-and-structures/
74. Zhiyu LUO | National University of Singapore, Singapore | NUS | Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering | Research profile – ResearchGate, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Zhiyu-Luo-3
75. A*STAR Institute of Materials Research and Engineering (A*STAR IMRE) – Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.a-star.edu.sg/imre
76. Life Cycle Cost Assessment of Engineered Cementitious Composite (ECC) Precast Pavement in Singapore – ResearchGate, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331703316_Life_Cycle_Cost_Assessment_of_Engineered_Cementitious_Composite_ECC_Precast_Pavement_in_Singapore
77. Natural Fibers in Composite Materials for Sustainable Building: A State-of-the-Art Review on Treated Hemp Fibers and Hurds in Mortars – MDPI, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/23/10368
78. A Comprehensive Review on Construction Applications and Life Cycle Sustainability of Natural Fiber Biocomposites – MDPI, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/14/23/15905
79. (PDF) Engineering Bamboo: The new composite Reinforcement – ResearchGate, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/295908450_Engineering_Bamboo_The_new_composite_Reinforcement
80. Alternative Construction Materials – Future Cities Laboratory | ETH Zurich, accessed July 12, 2025, https://fcl.ethz.ch/research/fcl-phase2/archipelago-cities/alternative-construction-materials.html
81. About the Programme – beamp, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.beamp.sg/about
82. Recent Progress on Polymer Materials for Additive Manufacturing – Nanyang Technological University, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.ntu.edu.sg/docs/librariesprovider152/research/compressed.pdf?sfvrsn=5395db1f_3

Powerful Innovations in Design for Disassembly – AEC Technical Advisory Singapore Engineering Consultancy, accessed July 12, 2025, https://www.aectechnicalsg.com/dfd-economy-singapore-construction/