Part 1: The Ticking Clock: Singapore’s Dual Challenge of Aging People and Aging Concrete

In the hyper-dense, meticulously planned urban landscape of Singapore, the health and longevity of its infrastructure are not merely engineering concerns; they are matters of national resilience, economic vitality, and public safety. Every bridge, skyscraper, tunnel, and public housing block is a critical asset in a complex, interconnected system. 

For decades, ensuring the integrity of these structures relied on periodic, manual inspections—a process that was often labour-intensive, subjective, and reactive.1 However, the nation now stands at a critical juncture, facing a confluence of two powerful, time-driven forces: a rapidly aging population and a maturing portfolio of built assets. 

This dual challenge necessitates a fundamental paradigm shift in how infrastructure is managed, moving from intermittent checks to continuous vigilance. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) emerges not as a technological luxury, but as the core enabling technology to navigate this complex future, ensuring the nation’s physical backbone can support its social and economic ambitions for generations to come.

This report provides an exhaustive analysis of the application of SHM within the specific context of Singapore. It explores the foundational principles of SHM, delves into the advanced technologies being integrated into monitoring systems, and examines the unique ecosystem that positions Singapore as a global leader in this domain. 

Through local case studies—from the deep tunnels of the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) to the automated inspection of high-rise residential blocks—this report will illustrate how data-driven monitoring is moving beyond theory and into practice. 

Ultimately, this analysis will demonstrate that Singapore’s approach is more than just technological adoption; it is the deliberate creation of a self-reinforcing ecosystem where policy, research, and industry converge to build a safer, more efficient, and truly intelligent built environment.1

 

1.1 The Silver Tsunami Meets Mature Infrastructure

 

Singapore is on an accelerated path toward becoming a “super-aged” society. Government estimates project that by 2030, one in four Singaporeans will be over the age of 65, with the nation officially crossing the 21% threshold for this demographic label in 2026.3 

This profound demographic transformation places immense pressure on the nation’s social fabric and, critically, on its physical infrastructure. The government has proactively responded with comprehensive national strategies like “Age Well SG,” a multi-ministry program designed to create a supportive environment for seniors to live active, healthy, and independent lives within their communities.4

A cornerstone of this strategy is the concept of “aging-in-place,” which depends on the ability to retrofit and adapt the existing built environment. Initiatives like the Enhancement for Active Seniors (EASE) programme are a direct manifestation of this policy, offering senior-friendly fittings such as grab bars, bidet sprays, and lowered kerbs in both public Housing & Development Board (HDB) flats and private residences.4 

Similarly, the Neighbourhood Renewal Programme (NRP) is being extended to older estates to incorporate senior-friendly amenities like therapeutic gardens, barrier-free ramps, and dementia-friendly way-finding features.4 These programs underscore a clear national commitment to making physical spaces safer and more accessible for a growing elderly population, which will include an estimated 83,000 seniors living alone by 2030.3

This social imperative converges with a parallel engineering reality: the very infrastructure intended to support this aging population is itself aging. Much of Singapore’s foundational infrastructure—its first-generation HDB blocks, bridges, and transport networks—was constructed during the nation’s rapid development from the 1970s through the 1990s. 

These assets, while built to high standards, are now decades old and subject to the inevitable processes of material degradation, fatigue, and corrosion.6 The universal challenge of managing structures operating well beyond their original design lives is particularly acute in a dense city-state like Singapore, where any infrastructural failure could have devastating consequences for its society and economy.8

This intersection of social policy and engineering necessity creates a powerful, state-level impetus for the adoption of advanced monitoring technologies. The success of a program like EASE is not just about the installation of a grab bar; it is about ensuring the structural integrity of the wall to which that grab bar is affixed. 

The social goal of aging-in-place is fundamentally predicated on the verifiable safety and reliability of the housing stock and public facilities that seniors depend on. A senior-friendly feature on a structurally compromised building is not an asset but a liability. 

Therefore, SHM transitions from being a tool for maintenance cost reduction to a critical enabler of a national social objective. It provides the technological means to verify the “state of health” of these aging buildings, ensuring that the platform for social policy is itself safe and sound.

 

1.2 Beyond Visual Checks: The Paradigm Shift from Maintenance to Monitoring

 

For decades, the framework for ensuring structural safety in Singapore has been anchored in a traditional, time-based inspection regime. The Building and Construction Authority (BCA), the primary regulator of the built environment, mandates a Periodic Structural Inspection (PSI) for all buildings.10 

This legal requirement stipulates that non-residential buildings must be inspected every five years, while residential buildings undergo inspection every ten years.12 The process involves a visual inspection conducted by a qualified Professional Engineer, who then submits a report to the BCA with recommendations for any necessary repairs.11 This approach has served Singapore well, establishing a baseline of accountability for building owners.

However, this conventional model has inherent limitations, particularly in the context of an aging infrastructure portfolio. The effectiveness of any maintenance program is only as good as its ability to reveal problematic performance in a timely manner.14 Periodic, manual inspections are, by nature, intermittent. They provide a snapshot of a structure’s condition at a single point in time, leaving long intervals during which defects like cracks or corrosion can initiate and propagate unnoticed.7 

By the time such damage becomes visually apparent to an inspector, it may have already progressed to a stage where repair is costly or, in the worst case, where asset failure is imminent. Furthermore, visual inspections are often superficial, incapable of detecting hidden or internal damage within a structure’s core components.15

This is where Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) represents a fundamental paradigm shift. SHM is formally defined as the process of implementing a damage identification strategy for engineering infrastructure, involving the observation of a system over time using periodically sampled dynamic response measurements from an array of sensors.14 

It is a move away from the reactive, calendar-based “find-and-fix” model toward a proactive, data-driven, and condition-based “sense-and-respond” approach.1 Instead of relying on infrequent human observation, SHM supplements these checks with continuous, online, and automated systems that act as a digital nervous system for a structure.14

A comprehensive SHM system operates on the premise that structural damage or deterioration will inevitably alter a structure’s intrinsic physical properties, primarily its stiffness.16 These alterations, in turn, cause measurable changes in the structure’s dynamic response, such as its natural frequencies of vibration or its mode shapes. By continuously monitoring these dynamic characteristics, an SHM system can achieve four hierarchical levels of damage assessment:

1. Detection: Determining if damage has occurred.
2. Localization: Pinpointing the location of the damage.
3. Quantification: Assessing the severity of the damage.
4. Prognosis: Estimating the remaining service life of the structure.16

This capability transforms infrastructure management. It allows asset owners to move from scheduled maintenance to condition-based maintenance (CBM), where repairs are performed only when data indicates they are necessary, optimizing resources and reducing unnecessary downtime.1 

More importantly, it provides early warnings of impending issues, mitigating the risk of catastrophic failures that could endanger lives and disrupt the economy.9

The adoption of SHM should not be seen as a replacement for regulation like the PSI, but rather as its next logical evolution. It takes the spirit of the law—the duty of building owners to ensure structural safety—and transforms its execution from a periodic, analogue process into a continuous, digital one. 

The BCA’s own “Smart Inspection” initiative, which envisions a future of virtualized inspections leveraging sensor data and digital platforms, is a clear signal of this trajectory.19 SHM provides the rich, real-time data stream that is essential to power such a future regulatory model, making compliance more robust, efficient, and effective.

 

Part 2: The Anatomy of a Digital Nervous System: Core SHM Technologies

 

At its core, a Structural Health Monitoring system is an integrated network of hardware and software designed to function as a building’s or bridge’s nervous system. It continuously senses the structure’s condition, transmits this information, and processes it to diagnose health. 

This digital ecosystem comprises two primary components: the sensors, which act as the nerve endings capturing the structure’s pulse, and the analytical brain, which transforms floods of raw data into actionable intelligence. Understanding these core technologies is essential to appreciating the power and potential of modern SHM.

 

2.1 The Sensors: Capturing the Structure’s Pulse

 

The foundation of any SHM system is its sensor network. The choice of sensor technology is critical and depends on the type of structure, the environmental conditions, and the specific parameters being monitored. In the context of Singapore’s dense and complex urban environment, several key technologies have emerged as particularly suitable.

Fiber Optic Sensors (FOS) have become a superior choice for many civil engineering applications due to a unique combination of advantages.20 These sensors operate by sending a beam of light through a glass fiber and analyzing how that light changes as it travels. Any external factor that affects the fiber, such as strain, temperature, or vibration, modulates the properties of the light (e.g., its wavelength, phase, or intensity), which can then be measured with high precision.21 A prominent type is the

Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) sensor, which has a periodic variation in the refractive index inscribed into the fiber’s core. This grating reflects a very specific wavelength of light, known as the Bragg wavelength (λB​). When the fiber is strained or its temperature changes, the grating period shifts, causing a measurable change in the reflected wavelength.21 This makes FBGs highly effective for precise, localized measurements.

The key advantages of FOS are manifold. They are lightweight, compact, and made of glass, making them immune to the electromagnetic interference (EMI) that can plague traditional electronic sensors, a crucial feature in environments with extensive power grids and electrified rail lines.22 

They are also highly durable, resistant to corrosion, and can operate reliably in the harsh environments found in concrete structures or marine settings.20 Furthermore, FOS technology allows for extensive multiplexing, where hundreds of sensors can be strung along a single fiber, simplifying cabling and making them scalable for monitoring large structures like bridges and tunnels.21

Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs) offer a compelling alternative to traditional wired monitoring systems, primarily by eliminating the need for extensive and costly cabling between sensors and the central data acquisition unit.25 This dramatically reduces installation costs and time, making it economically feasible to deploy a much denser network of sensors across a structure.27 WSNs are not merely passive data transmitters; each wireless sensor is an autonomous node equipped with a sensing transducer, a microprocessor, and a radio transceiver.27 

This onboard computational power allows the sensor to perform its own data processing and interrogation tasks locally—a concept known as edge computing. This capability is particularly attractive for SHM, as it allows for data to be screened for signs of damage at the source, reducing the volume of data that needs to be transmitted wirelessly.27 

However, the deployment of WSNs for the demanding requirements of SHM presents significant technical challenges, including managing power consumption for long-term operation, ensuring high data throughput, achieving precise time synchronization across all nodes, and maintaining fault tolerance within the network.25

Piezoelectric Sensors are another critical technology, particularly for active monitoring. These sensors are made from materials that generate an electric charge in response to applied mechanical stress (the piezoelectric effect). Conversely, when an electric field is applied to them, they deform. 

This dual capability allows them to be used not only as sensors to detect vibrations and acoustic waves but also as actuators to generate high-frequency stress waves (e.g., Lamb waves) that can be sent through a structure.31 By analyzing how these waves are altered as they propagate, engineers can detect damage like cracks or delamination with high sensitivity.32

Vision-Based Systems represent a rapidly advancing, non-contact approach to SHM. These systems use one or more high-resolution cameras—increasingly including those found on common smartphones—to monitor a structure.34 By tracking the movement of specific targets or natural features on the structure’s surface, image processing algorithms can measure displacements, deformations, and even crack propagation with remarkable accuracy.35 This contactless method avoids the risks and costs associated with installing physical sensors, especially in hard-to-reach or hazardous locations.37

Finally, SHM is often used in conjunction with a suite of Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) techniques. While SHM provides continuous, global monitoring, NDT methods offer detailed, localized inspection to characterize specific defects. These include techniques like Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) to detect subsurface anomalies, Infrared Thermography to identify delamination through thermal signatures, and Acoustic Emission (AE) and Ultrasonic Testing (UT) to detect crack initiation and growth by analyzing stress waves.15 An effective asset management strategy often involves using the SHM system to flag a potential area of concern, which then triggers a targeted NDT inspection for a more detailed diagnosis.14

Table 1: Comparison of Key SHM Sensor Technologies

 

Technology	Principle	Key Parameters Measured	Accuracy/Precision	Scalability	Cost (Installation & Maintenance)	Durability/EMI Resistance	Ideal Use Case in Singapore
Fiber Optic Sensors (FOS)	Measures modulation of light (wavelength, phase, intensity) in a glass fiber due to external stimuli. 22	Strain, Temperature, Vibration, Pressure, Displacement 21	Very High. FBG offers precise, absolute measurements. 23	High. Easily multiplexed on a single cable for long distances (e.g., tunnels, pipelines). 21	High initial interrogator cost, but lower cabling cost for large-scale deployments. Low maintenance. 18	Excellent. Immune to EMI and corrosion, suitable for harsh environments. 22	Long-term embedded monitoring in critical concrete infrastructure like MRT tunnels, deep foundations, and bridges. 40
Wireless Sensor Networks (WSN)	Autonomous nodes with sensors, processors, and radios transmit data wirelessly. 27	Vibration (Accelerometers), Strain, Tilt, Displacement. 30	Good to High. Dependent on the attached sensor quality and network synchronization.	Excellent. Highly scalable for dense instrumentation of large areas like building complexes. 27	Low installation cost due to no wiring. Maintenance involves battery replacement (unless using energy harvesting). 26	Moderate. Susceptible to EMI and signal interference, though protocols can mitigate this. 42	Rapid deployment and monitoring of numerous HDB blocks, temporary monitoring during construction, or areas where cabling is impractical. 25
Piezoelectric Sensors	Generates an electric charge from mechanical stress (or vice-versa), enabling active wave propagation methods. 32	High-frequency Vibration, Acoustic Emission, Wave Propagation, Strain. 31	High sensitivity for dynamic events and active damage detection. 22	Moderate. Typically used for localized, critical component monitoring rather than global coverage.	Moderate. Cost of sensors and data acquisition systems can be significant.	Good. Generally robust, but can be brittle and require careful installation. 22	Active monitoring of fatigue-prone steel components, such as in bridges, cranes, or industrial machinery. 33
Vision-Based Systems	Uses cameras and image processing algorithms to track movement and changes on a structure’s surface. 34	Displacement, Deformation, Strain Fields, Crack Detection/Propagation. 36	Good to High. Accuracy depends on camera resolution, lighting, and algorithm sophistication.	High. A single camera can monitor a large area. Can leverage existing CCTV or mobile devices. 35	Very Low to Moderate. Can use low-cost cameras. No installation on the structure itself. Software can be costly. 34	Non-contact, so durability is not an issue for the structure. Camera performance is subject to weather/lighting. 34	Contactless monitoring of bridge deflections, building sway, façade inspections, and tracking construction progress. 39

 

2.2 The Brain: From Raw Data to Actionable Intelligence

 

Capturing data is only the first step. The true power of SHM lies in its ability to transform the torrent of raw sensor readings into clear, actionable intelligence about a structure’s health. This is a formidable challenge. A single large-scale SHM system can generate immense volumes of data, far exceeding what human analysts can effectively process.42 

More critically, the data is inherently noisy. The dynamic response of a structure is constantly influenced by changing environmental and operational conditions, such as daily and seasonal temperature cycles, humidity, wind loads, and live traffic on a bridge.6 

These environmental effects can often induce changes in sensor readings that are far greater in magnitude than those caused by incipient damage, creating a significant risk of false alarms or, conversely, of masking the subtle signals of a genuine problem.44

This is where the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) has become a revolutionary force in the SHM market.28 AI-powered systems are not just programmed with fixed rules; they are designed to learn. By analyzing vast historical datasets from a structure, ML models can learn the complex, nonlinear relationships between environmental inputs (like temperature) and the structure’s “normal” response. 

This allows them to build a sophisticated baseline model of healthy behavior.17 Once this baseline is established, the system can effectively filter out the environmental noise and identify true anomalies—deviations from expected behavior that may indicate damage.44

The application of AI in SHM is multifaceted. Supervised learning models, trained on data from both healthy and damaged states (often generated through computer simulations), can be used to classify the condition of a structure. 

Deep learning algorithms, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks, are particularly adept at recognizing patterns in complex data. They are being used to automatically identify cracks from images, reconstruct missing or corrupted sensor data, and detect damage signatures from raw vibration signals.39

The ultimate goal of this intelligent analysis is to enable a transition from reactive or even condition-based maintenance to truly predictive maintenance.16 By identifying subtle degradation trends long before they become critical, an AI-driven SHM system can forecast potential failures and recommend specific maintenance actions, allowing asset managers to intervene proactively.17

This infusion of AI is more than just an enhancement; it is the engine that makes large-scale SHM feasible. Consider the ambition to monitor thousands of HDB blocks or hundreds of kilometers of tunnels across Singapore.4 If the data from every sensor required manual analysis by an expert engineer, the human and financial resources required would be astronomical, creating an insurmountable bottleneck. 

AI and ML algorithms serve as an intelligent, automated first line of defense. They continuously sift through the data deluge, autonomously identifying patterns, filtering noise, and flagging only the most salient anomalies for human review. In this way, AI solves the critical problem of interpretive scalability, making the vision of a city-wide, continuously monitored built environment an operational reality.

 

Part 3: SHM in the Lion City: Policy, Projects, and Case Studies

 

While the technologies of Structural Health Monitoring are globally applicable, their implementation in Singapore is uniquely shaped by a confluence of proactive government policy, ambitious national projects, and a forward-thinking innovation ecosystem. 

The nation’s journey with SHM is not one of piecemeal adoption but a strategic, top-down and bottom-up integration into the very fabric of its urban development. This section examines the specific policies driving this adoption and presents detailed case studies of SHM in action across Singapore’s most critical infrastructure assets: its transport network, public housing, and essential utilities.

 

3.1 The National Blueprint: How Policy Drives Adoption

 

The rapid uptake of SHM in Singapore is not an accident of the market but a direct consequence of a coordinated, multi-agency national strategy. Several key government bodies and overarching policies create a fertile ground for the adoption of advanced monitoring technologies.

At the forefront is the Building and Construction Authority (BCA), which serves as the lead agency for transforming the built environment sector. Beyond its regulatory role in mandating inspections, the BCA actively drives innovation through strategic roadmaps like the Built Environment Industry Transformation Map (BE ITM).10 The BE ITM aims to create a highly productive, sustainable, and technologically advanced sector. Key pillars of this map, such as

Integrated Digital Delivery (IDD) and Design for Maintainability (DfM), directly encourage practices where SHM is a natural fit. IDD promotes the use of digital tools like Building Information Modeling (BIM) throughout a project’s lifecycle, creating a digital backbone into which live SHM data can be integrated. 

DfM requires designers to consider the long-term maintenance needs of a structure from the outset, making the case for built-in monitoring systems more compelling.1 The BCA further supports this transition by providing financial assistance through grants like the S$250-million

Construction Productivity and Capability Fund (CPCF) and the Built Environment Technology and Capability Grant, which help firms de-risk the adoption of new technologies.10

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) is another powerful driver of SHM adoption. As the owner and operator of one of the world’s most extensive and rapidly expanding transport networks, the LTA has an immense portfolio of aging and new assets to manage, including hundreds of kilometers of tunnels and thousands of bridges and viaducts.49 

The sheer scale of its ongoing expansion projects—such as the Cross Island Line and Jurong Region Line—and its commitment to high levels of safety and reliability necessitate the use of advanced monitoring both during construction and throughout the operational lifespan of these assets.51

These sector-specific initiatives are all aligned with Singapore’s overarching Smart Nation vision. Spearheaded by the Prime Minister’s Office, this national agenda seeks to leverage data and technology to improve every aspect of citizens’ lives.1 

In this context, SHM is not just an engineering tool but a crucial component of a smart city’s infrastructure. It provides the real-time data needed to build a resilient, responsive, and efficient urban environment. This high-level political backing creates a powerful incentive for public agencies and private developers alike to invest in smart technologies like SHM.

Finally, social policies from the Ministry of National Development (MND) and the Ministry of Health (MOH), such as the Age Well SG program, create an indirect but potent demand for SHM. 

As detailed earlier, ensuring the structural integrity of the nation’s housing stock is a prerequisite for the success of aging-in-place policies, linking SHM directly to the well-being of a significant and growing segment of the population.4

Table 2: Singapore’s Key Infrastructure Policies and Their Impact on SHM

 

Policy/Initiative	Lead Agency	Core Objective	Direct/Indirect Impact on SHM Adoption
Built Environment ITM	BCA	Increase productivity, sustainability, and digitalization in the construction sector. 50	Direct: Promotes digitalization (IDD, BIM) and data-driven approaches, creating a clear demand for the real-time data that SHM systems provide. 1
Smart Nation	PMO (SNDGO, GovTech)	Leverage technology and data to improve the lives of citizens and create economic opportunities. 1	Direct: Positions SHM as a key enabling technology for creating a smart, resilient, and safe built environment, a core pillar of the Smart Nation vision.
Age Well SG	MOH / MND	Create a supportive environment for seniors to age actively and comfortably in their homes and communities. 5	Indirect: Creates a high-stakes need for SHM to verify the structural safety of aging HDB blocks and public facilities, underpinning the physical platform for this national social policy. 4
BCA Smart Inspection	BCA	Modernize the regulatory inspection process using virtual tools, sensors, and data analytics. 19	Direct: Signals a future regulatory framework where continuous sensor data from SHM systems could supplement or enhance periodic manual inspections, driving proactive adoption. 19
LTA Rail & Road Expansion	LTA	Expand the transport network to meet future demand while ensuring high safety and reliability. 49	Direct: Generates immense demand for SHM to monitor critical assets (tunnels, bridges) during construction in a dense urban setting and for long-term operational health. 52

 

3.2 Case Study: Guarding the Arteries – Monitoring Singapore’s MRT Tunnels and Bridges

 

The Land Transport Authority (LTA) manages a portfolio of civil infrastructure whose scale and complexity are staggering. With a target of expanding the rail network to 360 km by the early 2030s, the LTA is constantly engaged in massive construction projects that navigate the dense urban and subterranean landscape of Singapore.49 The construction and long-term maintenance of these assets—particularly tunnels and bridges—represent a prime application area for SHM.

Tunnelling for new MRT lines like the Downtown Line (DTL), Thomson-East Coast Line (TEL), and the upcoming Cross Island Line (CRL) presents immense engineering challenges. These tunnels are often bored directly beneath existing buildings, critical utilities, and active roadways.54 The primary risk during construction is excavation-induced ground movement, which can cause settlement and potential damage to nearby structures. 

To mitigate this, contractors employ a rigorous instrumentation and monitoring regime. This involves deploying a dense network of sensors, including inclinometers, settlement markers, and tiltmeters, on the ground surface and on adjacent buildings to provide real-time feedback on any movement. 

This data allows Tunnel Boring Machine (TBM) operators to make immediate adjustments to parameters like face pressure to control ground deformation and ensure the safety of the surrounding urban environment.54 This real-time monitoring is not just a best practice; it is a critical risk management tool that allows these complex projects to proceed without disrupting the city above.

Beyond construction, the long-term health of the LTA’s extensive network of bridges and viaducts is a major focus. As part of a program to upgrade existing highway bridges to sustain heavier vehicle loads, the LTA has utilized SHM to validate the effectiveness of retrofitting works.55 A notable case study is the

Pioneer Bridge, an 18-meter span pre-stressed concrete bridge. To assess the impact of an upgrade that involved strengthening the deck end bearings, a multi-stage SHM approach was used. First, a bridge health monitor, equipped with accelerometers and longitudinal strain gauges, was installed on the soffit of the T-beams. 

This system logged traffic-induced vibrations and strains over a one-month period to establish a baseline of the bridge’s pre-upgrade performance. After the retrofitting was complete, a second phase of monitoring was conducted to quantify the structural improvement. This data-driven approach provides objective proof of the upgrade’s success, moving beyond simple reliance on design calculations.55 

In another project, an expressway viaduct was instrumented with a combination of conventional static sensors and advanced Fiber Bragg Grating (FBG) arrays, with the data managed and transmitted via wireless and internet technologies, showcasing the adoption of modern SHM architectures.55

 

3.3 Case Study: The Heartlands’ Health – Monitoring HDB Public Housing

 

While SHM is commonly applied to large-scale civil structures like bridges and dams, its application to residential buildings has been relatively limited globally, often due to concerns over cost, owner liability, and privacy.14 In this regard, Singapore’s proactive approach to monitoring its public housing stock is globally significant and pioneering. 

The Housing & Development Board (HDB), as the nation’s public housing authority, has undertaken a large-scale, long-term monitoring program to ensure the safety and quality of its high-rise residential buildings.

The seminal project in this initiative was the Punggol East Contract 26 (EC26), which commenced in 2001.56 This was considered a landmark pilot project with several ambitious aims: to develop a viable monitoring strategy for high-rise, column-supported buildings; to increase knowledge of their real-world structural behavior over their entire lifecycle; to control construction quality; and to create a system for evaluating the building’s health after a hazardous event like a strong tremor.57

The methodology involved embedding long-gauge fiber optic strain sensors (using the SOFO monitoring system) directly into the fresh concrete of the most critical structural elements—the ground-level columns—of a 19-story building (Block 166A).56 This approach allowed monitoring to begin from the very birth of the structure. The installation was carried out by

Sofotec Singapore, a local SHM specialist firm.59 During construction, sensor readings were taken manually after the completion of each new story. After construction was complete, the sensors were connected to a centralized data acquisition system for continuous, long-term monitoring.58

The results from this ten-year-plus monitoring program were invaluable. The system provided a rich dataset that allowed engineers to track the long-term behavior of the building through every stage of its life. The analysis of the strain data was performed at both a local (individual column) and global (entire building) level. 

The monitoring was so precise that it successfully identified the over-dimensioning of one specific column and, more critically, detected, localized, and estimated the magnitude of a differential settlement occurring in the building’s foundations.56 This level of detailed, objective data provided HDB’s designers and engineers with unprecedented insights into the real-world performance of their building designs, leading to refinements for future projects. 

The resounding success of the Punggol pilot project validated the approach, leading the HDB to instrument over 400 other high-rise buildings, establishing one of the world’s most extensive residential building monitoring programs.56

 

3.4 Case Study: The Unseen Superhighway – The Deep Tunnel Sewerage System (DTSS)

 

Among Singapore’s most critical infrastructure assets is one that is almost entirely invisible: the Deep Tunnel Sewerage System (DTSS). The DTSS is a massive, island-wide “superhighway” for collecting and transporting used water to centralized reclamation plants for treatment and recycling, forming the backbone of Singapore’s water sustainability strategy.60 

The tunnels are located deep underground, and their harsh, corrosive environment makes regular manual inspection extremely challenging, hazardous, and disruptive.61 Ensuring the long-term structural integrity of this vital system is therefore a perfect application for advanced, remote SHM technologies.

Phase 2 of the DTSS project, which includes the construction of the Tuas Water Reclamation Plant (TWRP), has seen the deployment of comprehensive monitoring solutions. The company Encardio-Rite, a specialist in geotechnical and structural monitoring, was significantly involved in this phase. 

Their systems were deployed to monitor ground movements during construction and to assess the long-term structural integrity of the tunnels, using an array of sensors including vibrating wire piezometers (to measure water pressure), inclinometers (to measure ground shifts), and strain gauges (to detect stress on the tunnel lining).62

Given the inaccessibility of the tunnels, research has focused on advanced NDT and robotic inspection methods. One study, using the DTSS-Phase 2 project as a case study, investigated the use of Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) for the quality assessment of the tunnel’s steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC) composite linings. 

The study used simulations and field tests to validate GPR’s effectiveness in this specific application.63 To overcome the physical challenges of inspection, another innovative solution proposed for the DTSS involves the use of a miniature, automated

unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). This drone would be capable of navigating the confined space of the tunnel to capture high-resolution visual data of the lining, allowing for remote inspection without human entry.61 These advanced approaches highlight a clear trend towards automated, remote, and data-driven methods for managing Singapore’s most critical and hard-to-reach infrastructure.

 

Part 4: The Innovation Ecosystem: Singapore’s R&D and Commercial Landscape

 

Singapore’s leadership in Structural Health Monitoring is underpinned by a vibrant and collaborative ecosystem that spans academia, government research institutes, and a dynamic commercial sector. This ecosystem functions as a powerful innovation engine, accelerating the development of new technologies and facilitating their transition from the laboratory to real-world application. 

The close partnership between world-class universities, specialized service providers, and supportive government agencies creates a self-reinforcing cycle of research, development, and deployment.

 

4.1 The Research Engines: NUS and NTU

 

At the heart of Singapore’s SHM innovation are its two premier research universities, the National University of Singapore (NUS) and Nanyang Technological University (NTU). Both institutions are recognized globally for their contributions to engineering and are home to cutting-edge research programs in SHM.

Nanyang Technological University (NTU) has established itself as a powerhouse in SHM research, with a strong focus on both foundational AI development and practical, low-cost sensing solutions. The School of Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) hosts research groups dedicated to SHM and structural reliability, with prominent researchers like Professor Ivan Au Siu Kui contributing significantly to the field.65 NTU has a long history of conducting SHM research on Singapore’s own infrastructure, particularly its highway bridges.8

One of NTU’s most significant recent contributions is the development of a unified AI framework for vision-based SHM. This technology moves beyond simple damage classification by redefining structural image analysis as a multi-attribute, multi-task problem. 

It employs advanced Multi-Task Learning (MTL) to train a single neural network to recognize multiple structural characteristics concurrently, improving both accuracy and computational efficiency.1 In parallel, NTU researchers have also focused on making SHM more accessible. The

Deformonit project, for example, is a low-cost, vision-based system that uses smartphone cameras for deformation monitoring, offering an affordable alternative to expensive, specialized equipment.34 

Other notable NTU research includes the use of piezoceramic sensors and Lamb wave techniques for load monitoring and the development of specialized long-gauge FBG sensors for monitoring building columns.33

The National University of Singapore (NUS) also boasts a formidable research program in SHM, with a strong emphasis on integrating monitoring technologies into larger, automated systems and tackling complex, large-scale engineering problems. The Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering (CEE) at NUS offers a dedicated graduate-level course on SHM (CE5515), ensuring a steady pipeline of trained talent.69 

The department is equipped with state-of-the-art facilities, including a Structural Engineering Laboratory with various NDT equipment and high-speed data acquisition systems, and hosts relevant research hubs like the Centre for Advanced Materials and Structures.70

NUS’s research projects demonstrate a clear focus on application and integration. Key projects include the development of an “Autonomous BIM-ready Drone System for Building Facades Inspection” and a “Look-Ahead Integrated Geophysical Investigation System (IGIS) for Singapore Tunnels.” 

These initiatives highlight a strategic direction towards automating inspection processes and fusing sensor data with digital construction models.71 The university is also tackling frontier challenges, with research positions focusing on applying SHM and machine learning for defect prediction in novel structures like floating tidal-wave energy systems, under the supervision of experts like Professor Koh Chan Ghee, who also serves as an editor for the international

Structural Health Monitoring journal.65

Observing the research trajectories of these two institutions reveals a synergistic, rather than purely competitive, relationship. NTU demonstrates exceptional strength in developing foundational AI algorithms and novel, cost-effective sensing platforms. NUS, in turn, excels at integrating these types of technologies into complex, applied systems to solve specific, large-scale infrastructure challenges. 

This complementarity creates a powerful R&D pipeline that efficiently translates fundamental scientific discovery into practical engineering solutions, a hallmark of Singapore’s strategic approach to technological innovation.

 

4.2 The Service Providers: From Global Giants to Local Specialists

 

The commercial landscape for SHM in Singapore is a mature and competitive market, populated by both homegrown innovators who have developed specialized niche technologies and the local operations of global engineering and testing giants. 

This blend of local expertise and international best practice provides asset owners in Singapore with a wide spectrum of solutions, from the supply of individual components to the delivery of comprehensive, turnkey monitoring platforms.

Among the local specialists, several firms have risen to prominence. Sofotec Singapore, founded in 2000, is a leading example of a homegrown success story. The firm specializes in SHM using Fiber Optic Sensors and has an extensive track record, having installed over 9,000 FOS in Singapore across various industries.74 

Their involvement in the pioneering HDB Punggol EC26 monitoring project from its inception highlights their deep experience and long-standing presence in the local market.59 Another key innovator is

Ackcio, a Singapore-based startup that has developed and patented a long-range wireless mesh networking technology specifically for industrial and construction monitoring. Their solution directly addresses the critical challenges of data transmission and reliability in WSNs, showcasing local innovation that solves a global problem.1 The ecosystem also includes component suppliers like

DenseLight Semiconductors, a Singaporean company that manufactures the specialized light sources essential for fiber optic sensing systems, demonstrating capability across the SHM value chain.76

Complementing this local expertise is the strong presence of global leaders who bring international experience and extensive resources to the Singapore market. SGS, a world leader in inspection, verification, testing, and certification, offers a comprehensive, IoT-ready, sensor-based SHM service in Singapore. 

Their solution provides continuous, remote monitoring and is positioned as a 24/7 virtual NDT inspector, helping clients reduce risk and optimize maintenance.7

DYWIDAG, another major international player, provides a versatile, sensor-agnostic SHM platform that can be tailored for a wide range of assets, including bridges, tunnels, and buildings. 

Their product portfolio includes specialized sensors like smart anchors for monitoring post-tensioned tendons and smart tilt sensors for tracking structural movement.77 Other global firms with a presence in Singapore include

Light Structures, a leading supplier of fiber optic monitoring systems primarily for the maritime and energy sectors 78, and

Hexagon, which offers advanced construction monitoring solutions that integrate survey data with AI-driven analysis.79 

This competitive landscape ensures that infrastructure owners in Singapore have access to the latest technologies and a range of service models to meet their specific monitoring needs.

 

Part 5: Overcoming the Hurdles: Addressing the Challenges of Urban SHM

 

While the promise of Structural Health Monitoring is immense, its widespread and effective implementation is not without significant challenges. Deploying a reliable and cost-effective SHM system, particularly within a complex and dynamic urban environment like Singapore, requires navigating a host of technical, environmental, and economic hurdles. 

A realistic assessment of these barriers is crucial for asset owners, engineers, and policymakers to develop robust and trustworthy monitoring strategies. The challenges range from distinguishing the faint signal of damage from the loud noise of daily operations to justifying the significant upfront investment.

 

5.1 The Signal and the Noise: Technical and Environmental Challenges

 

One of the most pervasive technical challenges in SHM is managing the effects of Environmental and Operational Variability (EOV). The physical properties and dynamic responses of a structure are not static; they change constantly due to benign environmental factors. Daily and seasonal temperature fluctuations cause materials to expand and contract, altering a structure’s stiffness. Humidity, wind loading, and the weight of traffic on a bridge all induce responses that are captured by sensors.6 

The critical problem is that these environmental effects can often produce changes in sensor readings that are of a similar or even greater magnitude than those caused by actual, incipient damage.44 This “noise” can easily mask the “signal” of a developing defect, leading to two undesirable outcomes: false alarms, which erode trust in the system and lead to costly, unnecessary inspections, or missed detections, which can have catastrophic consequences.43 

Advanced data analysis techniques, particularly ML algorithms trained to model and subtract these environmental effects, are the primary strategy for overcoming this fundamental challenge.44

The sheer volume and quality of data generated by a continuous monitoring system present another major hurdle. A dense network of sensors recording data at high frequencies can produce terabytes of information, creating significant challenges for data transmission, storage, and real-time processing.6 

This is especially true for WSNs, where bandwidth and power are constrained. Furthermore, data can be corrupted or lost due to sensor malfunction, communication dropouts, or power failures. This necessitates the use of sophisticated data management strategies and imputation algorithms, such as those based on Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) or Convolutional Neural Networks (1DCNNs), to reconstruct missing data and ensure the integrity of the dataset used for analysis.47

The physical deployment of the sensor network also involves complex optimization problems. Optimal Sensor Placement (OSP) is a critical field of study within SHM. The number, type, and location of sensors directly impact the system’s ability to detect and localize damage accurately, as well as its overall cost.16 

Placing too few sensors may result in blind spots where damage goes undetected, while placing too many increases cost and data management complexity. Engineers often use advanced computational tools, such as Finite Element Modeling (FEM), to simulate a structure’s behavior and identify the most informative locations for sensor placement to maximize monitoring effectiveness.42

Finally, the uniqueness of most civil structures poses a challenge not typically faced in other industries like aerospace, where components are mass-produced and type-tested. Every building and bridge is, to some extent, unique in its design, construction, and material properties.14 

This means there is no pre-existing, universal baseline for what constitutes “normal” behavior. A significant portion of any SHM implementation must therefore be dedicated to a long-term learning phase, where the system collects data over months or even years to establish a robust, structure-specific model of health before it can reliably detect anomalies.14

Table 3: Key Challenges in Urban SHM and Mitigation Strategies

 

Challenge	Description	Impact on SHM Reliability	Mitigation Strategies & Technologies
Environmental Noise (EOV)	Sensor readings are masked by non-damage factors like temperature, humidity, and operational loads. 44	High rate of false positives or missed detections, eroding trust in the system and potentially overlooking real damage. 43	Use AI/ML models to learn and filter out environmental effects; install sensors to measure environmental parameters (e.g., thermocouples) for data correlation. 44
Data Volume & Quality	SHM systems generate massive datasets that can be difficult to transmit, store, and process. Data can be lost or corrupted. 42	Incomplete or unreliable data leads to inaccurate analysis and diagnosis. Data overload can overwhelm processing capabilities.	Deploy wireless edge computing to pre-process data at the sensor node; use advanced data imputation algorithms (GANs, 1DCNNs) to reconstruct missing data; leverage cloud storage. 28
Optimal Sensor Placement (OSP)	Deciding the best number, type, and location of sensors is a complex optimization problem. 16	Poor placement can lead to “blind spots” where damage is missed or an inability to accurately locate detected damage. 42	Use Finite Element Modeling (FEM) to simulate structural behavior and identify areas of high strain energy or sensitivity to damage; employ optimization algorithms. 42
System Cost & ROI	High upfront investment for sensors, data acquisition hardware, and analysis software can be a barrier to adoption. 42	Asset owners may delay or forgo SHM adoption, relying on less effective traditional inspection methods.	Develop and use low-cost WSNs and vision-based systems; clearly articulate the ROI by quantifying the cost of failure and savings from predictive maintenance. 9
Data Security	As SHM systems become connected to IoT networks, they are exposed to potential cybersecurity threats. 42	Unauthorized access could lead to data manipulation, false alarms, or theft of sensitive information about critical infrastructure.	Implement robust cybersecurity protocols, including data encryption, secure communication channels, and access control measures. 42

 

5.2 The Business Case: Justifying the Investment

 

Beyond the technical hurdles, the widespread adoption of SHM faces significant economic and organizational barriers. The most prominent of these is the initial cost. A comprehensive SHM system, including high-quality sensors, data acquisition hardware, communication infrastructure, and sophisticated analysis software, represents a substantial capital investment.42 

The monitoring system for the iconic Tsing Ma suspension bridge, for instance, was cited as costing approximately US$27,000 per sensing channel, a figure that can be prohibitive for many asset owners.18 This high upfront cost often deters stakeholders, particularly in the private sector, from adopting SHM solutions, leading them to rely on the perceived lower cost of traditional, time-based inspections.

This challenge is compounded by a lack of standardization. The SHM field is still evolving, and there is an absence of universally accepted protocols and regulations for system design, data formats, and performance validation.45 This can create uncertainty for asset owners, who may be hesitant to invest in a technology without clear industry benchmarks or a guaranteed path to regulatory acceptance.

Organizational and human factors also play a critical role. Within large organizations, there can be an inherent resistance to change and a reluctance to move away from long-established inspection practices.80 The successful implementation of an SHM program requires not just technology but also top management support and a workforce with the skills to manage and interpret the data. 

A lack of trained personnel can be a significant bottleneck.45 For owners of private residential and commercial properties, an additional psychological barrier exists: the potential obligations and financial consequences that come with knowing about their building’s poor structural health. This can create a disincentive to monitor, an issue that may only be overcome through education, legislative mandates, or financial incentives from insurers.14

The compelling counter-argument to these barriers is the immense cost of inaction. While SHM requires investment, the cost of doing nothing can be orders of magnitude greater. A minor, easily repairable defect like a small crack or localized corrosion, if left undetected, can grow into a major structural problem, potentially leading to a catastrophic failure. 

Such an event would not only result in tragic loss of life but also inflict millions of dollars in direct repair costs and secondary economic losses from business interruption and snarled supply chains.9 SHM provides the data to perform a detailed root cause analysis of a defect’s behavior, allowing engineers to understand why it is occurring. 

This enables a shift to targeted, preventive maintenance, minimizing downtime, extending the asset’s useful life, and ultimately providing a strong, long-term return on the initial investment.7

 

Part 6: The Next Frontier: Digital Twins and the Future of a Virtual Singapore

 

As Structural Health Monitoring technology matures, it is converging with other powerful digital trends to create a future where infrastructure is not just passively monitored but actively and intelligently managed. The evolution is from a collection of individual “smart structures” to an interconnected “smart city” ecosystem. 

This next frontier is defined by the rise of the Digital Twin and its ultimate expression on a national scale: the Virtual Singapore project. SHM is the foundational data layer that breathes life into these digital replicas, transforming them from static models into dynamic, predictive tools for building a more resilient nation.

 

6.1 From Monitoring to Simulation: The Rise of the Digital Twin

 

The concept of the Digital Twin is revolutionizing how complex assets are managed across numerous industries, and civil infrastructure is no exception. A Digital Twin (DT) is a virtual, high-fidelity replica of a physical asset, such as a bridge, a tunnel, or an entire building.28 This is far more than a static 3D model like those created in Building Information Modeling (BIM). 

The defining characteristic of a true DT is its dynamic connection to its physical counterpart. This connection is powered by real-time data streams, with SHM systems serving as the primary source.16

The synergy between SHM and Digital Twins is profound. The continuous flow of data from embedded and surface-mounted sensors—measuring strain, temperature, vibration, and displacement—is fed into the virtual model, allowing the DT to continuously evolve and mirror the real-world condition of the physical structure.28 This transforms the DT from a simple visualization tool into a living, breathing simulation platform.

This integration unlocks powerful new capabilities for asset management. It dramatically enhances predictive maintenance and real-time decision-making.16 With a live, data-fed Digital Twin, engineers can:

• Run “What-If” Scenarios: They can simulate the effects of future events on the virtual model before they happen in reality. For example, they could simulate the impact of a projected increase in traffic loading on a bridge or the structural response to a simulated seismic event, allowing for proactive strengthening and risk mitigation.
• Improve Diagnostics: When an anomaly is detected by the SHM system, engineers can use the DT to visualize the affected area and analyze the data in a rich, 3D context, leading to faster and more accurate root cause analysis.
• Optimize Performance: The DT can be used to test different operational strategies virtually to see how they impact the structure’s health and lifespan, helping to optimize performance and reduce wear and tear.

The adoption of Digital Twins integrated with SHM is a prominent market trend, actively being embraced by operators of critical infrastructure like large bridges, railways, and high-rise buildings.28 It represents the shift from merely knowing a structure’s current state to being able to reliably predict its future state, a crucial step towards truly intelligent infrastructure.

 

6.2 A Nation as a System: The Ultimate Vision of Virtual Singapore

 

The logical culmination of these trends—SHM, IoT, AI, and Digital Twins—is their application at a city-wide, and ultimately, a national scale. Singapore is at the global forefront of this ambition with its Virtual Singapore project. Initiated by the Singapore Land Authority (SLA) in collaboration with other agencies, Virtual Singapore is a dynamic, data-rich, and highly detailed 3D digital twin of the entire country.1 

It is envisioned as a collaborative data platform that can be used by public agencies, researchers, and businesses for a vast range of applications, from urban planning and environmental modeling to disaster response and infrastructure management.

In this grand vision, the thousands of individual SHM systems deployed across the island on bridges, tunnels, HDB blocks, and commercial buildings become the distributed “nerve endings” of a national nervous system. 

The real-time data they generate provides the live, dynamic data layer that populates and animates the Virtual Singapore platform.82 This allows for the health of the nation’s entire infrastructure portfolio to be monitored not as a collection of isolated assets, but as a single, interconnected system-of-systems.

This integrated approach enables a level of analysis and planning that was previously unimaginable. City planners could analyze the cumulative impact of multiple, simultaneous construction projects on the surrounding infrastructure. 

Emergency responders could use the platform during a crisis, such as a major flood or tremor, to get a real-time, city-wide overview of structural damage and prioritize response efforts. Asset managers could develop national-level maintenance strategies based on a holistic understanding of the health of the entire building stock.

The future of SHM in Singapore is inextricably linked to this vision. The continued integration of SHM with emerging technologies like 5G, which will enable massive, low-latency data transmission, and edge computing, which will allow for more powerful data processing at the sensor level, will further enhance these capabilities.28

In conclusion, Structural Health Monitoring in Singapore has evolved far beyond a simple engineering tool for detecting cracks. It has become a foundational pillar supporting the nation’s most critical strategic imperatives. It is an enabler of social policy, ensuring that an aging population can live safely and with dignity. It is the digital evolution of regulation, making safety compliance more robust and efficient. 

It is a catalyst for economic activity, allowing for the construction and maintenance of world-class infrastructure. And ultimately, it is a core component of the Smart Nation vision, providing the data-driven intelligence needed to build the resilient, responsive, and truly virtual Singapore of the future. The digital watchtower is in place, and it is securing the nation’s future, one data point at a time.

Works cited

1. How AI and Machine Learning Revolutionizing (SHM), accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.aectechnicalsg.com/ai-machine-learning-revolutionizing-shm/
2. A Prototype Remote Structural Health and Security Monitoring System for Bridges Submitted by Jason K. Herrman and Kirk A. – Mack-Blackwell Transportation Center, accessed July 19, 2025, https://mack-blackwell.uark.edu/Research/mbtc-3014-final-report-october-2014.pdf
3. Old is Gold: Singapore’s path to an elder-friendly future, accessed July 19, 2025, https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/gia/article/old-is-gold-singapores-path-to-an-elder-friendly-future
4. Living Environment – Age Well SG, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.agewellsg.gov.sg/living-environment/
5. IMPROVING ACCESS TO ACTIVE AGEING ACTIVITIES AND SENIOR-FRIENDLY INFRASTRUCTURE | Ministry of Health, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.moh.gov.sg/newsroom/improving-access-to-active-ageing-activities-and-senior-friendly-infrastructure
6. A Systematic Review of Structural Health Monitoring Systems to Strengthen Post-Earthquake Assessment Procedures – PubMed Central, accessed July 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9736237/
7. Structural Health Monitoring | SGS Singapore, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.sgs.com/en-sg/services/structural-health-monitoring
8. Applications of structural health monitoring technology in Asia – ResearchGate, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/304344956_Applications_of_structural_health_monitoring_technology_in_Asia
9. Structural Health Monitoring key to a more resilient, modern infrastructure network, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.usace.army.mil/Media/News/NewsSearch/Article/3276980/structural-health-monitoring-key-to-a-more-resilient-modern-infrastructure-netw/
10. Building and Construction Authority – Wikipedia, accessed July 19, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Building_and_Construction_Authority
11. Oral Answer by Ministry of National Development on maintenance of ageing private estates and commercial buildings, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.mnd.gov.sg/newsroom/speeches/view/oral-answer-by-ministry-of-national-development-on-maintenance-of-ageing-private-estates-and-commercial-buildings
12. BCA Periodic Structural Inspection – TKT Engineers, accessed July 19, 2025, https://tktengineers.com/service/bca-periodic-structural-inspection-psi-singapore/
13. Periodic Structural Inspection PSI Building And Construction Authority BCA – COPTR, accessed July 19, 2025, https://coptr.digipres.org/index.php/Periodic_Structural_Inspection_PSI_Building_And_Construction_Authority_BCA
14. Structural health monitoring of civil infrastructure | Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences – Journals, accessed July 19, 2025, https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2006.1925
15. Recent Advancements in Non-Destructive Testing Techniques for …, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/11/6/2750
16. Optimal Sensor Placement for Structural Health Monitoring: A Comprehensive Review, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2224-2708/14/2/22
17. The Future of Structural Health Monitoring – CEAI, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.ceai.org.in/the-future-of-structural-health-monitoring/
18. Structural health monitoring methodology for simply supported bridges: numerical implementation – SciELO Colombia, accessed July 19, 2025, http://www.scielo.org.co/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0120-62302007000100004
19. Building and Construction Authority (BCA), accessed July 19, 2025, https://www1.bca.gov.sg/
20. Why are fiber optic sensors considered a superior choice for structural health monitoring in modern infrastructure? | ResearchGate, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_are_fiber_optic_sensors_considered_a_superior_choice_for_structural_health_monitoring_in_modern_infrastructure
21. Optical Fiber-Based Structural Health Monitoring: Advancements, Applications, and Integration with Artificial Intelligence for Civil and Urban Infrastructure – MDPI, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2304-6732/12/6/615
22. Recent Progress of Fiber-Optic Sensors for the Structural Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure – PMC – PubMed Central, accessed July 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7472180/
23. Review on fiber-optic sensing in health monitoring of power grids – SPIE Digital Library, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/journals/Optical-Engineering/volume-58/issue-7/072007/Review-on-fiber-optic-sensing-in-health-monitoring-of-power/10.1117/1.OE.58.7.072007.full
24. OVERVIEW OF FIBRE OPTIC SENSING APPLICATIONS TO STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING – CiteSeerX, accessed July 19, 2025, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=10ec093b557d068621d697859958ec5ffc4569da
25. (PDF) Wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring: A …, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/334430725_Wireless_sensor_network_for_structural_health_monitoring_A_contemporary_review_of_technologies_challenges_and_future_direction
26. A Summary Review of Wireless Sensors and Sensor Networks for Structural Health Monitoring – ResearchGate, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255571249_A_Summary_Review_of_Wireless_Sensors_and_Sensor_Networks_for_Structural_Health_Monitoring
27. A Summary Review of Wireless Sensors and Sensor Networks for Structural Health Monitoring – CiteSeerX, accessed July 19, 2025, https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=f5305cd90970a8917392f1a0e65c2ecf69325374
28. Structural Health Monitoring Market Trends & Forecast 2025 …, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.pharmiweb.com/press-release/2025-07-11/structural-health-monitoring-market-trends-forecast-2025
29. Wireless sensor network for structural health monitoring: A contemporary review of technologies, challenges, and future directio – SciSpace, accessed July 19, 2025, https://scispace.com/pdf/wireless-sensor-network-for-structural-health-monitoring-a-26wwba5x79.pdf
30. Special Issue : Wireless Sensor Networks for Structural Health Monitoring – MDPI, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/journal/sensors/special_issues/SHM_WSN
31. Structural Health Monitoring in Sensor-Integrated Smart Composites – DEStech Publications, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.destechpub.com/product/structural-health-monitoring-in-sensor-integrated-smart-composites/
32. Smart Sensing Technologies for Structural Health Monitoring of Civil Engineering Structures, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/44848858_Smart_Sensing_Technologies_for_Structural_Health_Monitoring_of_Civil_Engineering_Structures
33. Study on Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) applications – DR-NTU, accessed July 19, 2025, https://dr.ntu.edu.sg/entities/publication/058dddbf-b02d-485f-b123-88fe8f225813
34. Vision-based Structural Health Monitoring | Nottingham Trent …, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.ntu.ac.uk/research/groups-and-centres/projects/vision-based-structural-health-monitoring
35. Paper: Structural Health Monitoring of Buildings Using Smartphone Sensors – Qingkai’s Blog, accessed July 19, 2025, http://qingkaikong.blogspot.com/2018/02/paper-structural-health-monitoring-of.html
36. Jau-Yu CHOU | Doctor of Philosophy | National Taiwan University, Taipei | NTU | Department of Civil Engineering | Research profile – ResearchGate, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jau-Yu-Chou
37. The Battle of Algorithms for Vision-based Structural Health Monitoring. – Nottingham Trent University, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.ntu.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/640163/Engineering-Challenge_2018_-applicant-brief.pdf
38. A Systematic Review of Advanced Sensor Technologies for Non-Destructive Testing and Structural Health Monitoring – MDPI, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/4/2204
39. (PDF) Recent Advancements in Non-Destructive Testing Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring – ResearchGate, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/350153920_Recent_Advancements_in_Non-Destructive_Testing_Techniques_for_Structural_Health_Monitoring
40. Stress Monitoring of Segment Structure during the Construction of the Small-Diameter Shield Tunnel – PMC, accessed July 19, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10574987/
41. Structural Health-Monitoring and Assessment in Tunnels: Hybrid Simulation Approach, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343367064_Structural_Health-Monitoring_and_Assessment_in_Tunnels_Hybrid_Simulation_Approach
42. Remote SHM: Challenges, Techniques, and Future Innovations – Encardio Rite, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.encardio.com/blog/remote-structural-health-monitoring-innovations
43. A Review of Innovations, Challenges, and Future Directions in Structural Health Monitoring Using Smart Materials – ResearchGate, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390930539_A_Review_of_Innovations_Challenges_and_Future_Directions_in_Structural_Health_Monitoring_Using_Smart_Materials
44. Environmental Factors in Structural Health Monitoring—Analysis and Removal of Effects from Resonance Frequencies – MDPI, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2224-2708/14/2/33
45. Global Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) Market Size, Share & Growth Opportunities, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.encardio.com/blog/global-structural-health-monitoring-shm-market
46. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) Utilising Unified AI technology | Nanyang Technological University | Innovation and Entrepreneurship | NTU Singapore, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.ntu.edu.sg/innovates/tech-portal/tech-offers/detail/structural-health-monitoring-utilising-unified-ai-technology
47. Reconstructing Health Monitoring Data of Railway Truss Bridges using One-dimensional Convolutional Neural Networks | Engineering, Technology & Applied Science Research, accessed July 19, 2025, https://etasr.com/index.php/ETASR/article/view/7515
48. A full‐scale case study of vibration‐based structural health monitoring of bridges: prospects and open challenges | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374179896_A_full-scale_case_study_of_vibration-based_structural_health_monitoring_of_bridges_prospects_and_open_challenges
49. Upcoming Projects – LTA, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.lta.gov.sg/content/ltagov/en/upcoming_projects.html
50. Singapore Building and Construction Sector – International Trade Administration, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.trade.gov/market-intelligence/singapore-building-and-construction-sector
51. Driving the Future: Singapore’s Land Transport Authority and the Road to Sustainable Urban Mobility – Southeast Asia Infrastructure, accessed July 19, 2025, https://southeastasiainfra.com/driving-the-future-singapores-land-transport-authority-and-the-road-to-sustainable-urban-mobility/
52. Expanding our Rail Network and Strengthening Rail Reliability and Resilience – LTA, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.lta.gov.sg/content/ltagov/en/newsroom/2025/3/news-releases/expanding_our_rail_network_and_strengthening_rail_reliability.html
53. Land Transport Authority – Wikipedia, accessed July 19, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Land_Transport_Authority
54. Case Histories of Bored Tunnelling Below Buildings in Singapore Downtown Line, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.geocasehistoriesjournal.org/pub/article/download/IJGCH_3_3_2/pdf_2
55. A Structural Health Monitoring Paradigm for Civil Infrastructure, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.fig.net/nottingham/proc/ts_06_5_brownjohn_etal.pdf
56. Ten-year monitoring of high-rise building columns using long-gauge fiber optic sensors – Princeton University, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.princeton.edu/~bglisic/10-year%20SHM%20Punggol.pdf
57. Long-term monitoring of high-rise buildings using long-gage fiber optic sensors – Telemac, accessed July 19, 2025, https://telemac.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/c125.pdf
58. Building Concrete Columns – Smartec, accessed July 19, 2025, https://smartec.ch/building-concrete-columns/
59. Analysis of lifespan monitoring data using Bayesian logic – Branko Glisic, accessed July 19, 2025, http://glisic-structuralhealthmonitoring.princeton.edu/Glisic_Bayesian_Buildings.pdf
60. Review of Fiber Optical Sensors and Its Importance in Sewer Corrosion Factor Analysis, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2227-9040/9/6/118
61. URBAN SUSTAINABILTY R&D CONGRESS 2019 DETAILED BREAKOUT TRACK SCHEDULE Day 1: 23rd July 2019 (Tues) Time Greater Sustainab – Ministry of National Development (MND), accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.mnd.gov.sg/docs/default-source/default-document-library/detailed-breakout-day-1_pdf.pdf
62. Sewer Tunnel Monitoring: Ensuring Safety and Integrity – Encardio Rite, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.encardio.com/blog/sewer-tunnel-monitoring
63. Ground penetrating radar detection of steel fiber reinforced composite linings in shield tunnels: Experimental and field studies | Request PDF – ResearchGate, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/390953593_Ground_penetrating_radar_detection_of_steel_fiber_reinforced_composite_linings_in_shield_tunnels_Experimental_and_field_studies
64. Ground penetrating radar detection of steel fiber reinforced … – CoLab, accessed July 19, 2025, https://colab.ws/articles/10.1007%2Fs11709-025-1165-8
65. Structural Health Monitoring | SAGE Publications Inc, accessed July 19, 2025, https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/structural-health-monitoring/journal201592
66. Research Focus | School of Civil and Environmental Engineering | NTU Singapore, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.ntu.edu.sg/cee/research/research-focus
67. CONDITIONAL ASSESSMENT OF HIGHWAY BRIDGE BY, accessed July 19, 2025, https://ore.exeter.ac.uk/repository/bitstream/handle/10871/19558/C128.pdf?sequence=1
68. Structural health monitoring of building columns using long gauge FBG sensors – DR-NTU, accessed July 19, 2025, https://dr.ntu.edu.sg/entities/publication/273b6fcd-8405-4584-9d3b-8d2bb92ed168
69. CE5515 Structural Health Monitoring – NUSMods, accessed July 19, 2025, https://nusmods.com/courses/CE5515/structural-health-monitoring
70. Structural Engineering Laboratory – Civil and Environmental Engineering | NUS, accessed July 19, 2025, https://cde.nus.edu.sg/cee/research/laboratories/structural-engineering-laboratory/
71. Civil and Environmental Engineering | NUS – College of Design and Engineering – National University of Singapore, accessed July 19, 2025, https://cde.nus.edu.sg/cee/
72. MSc (Civil Engineering) | NUS – Civil and Environmental Engineering – College of Design and Engineering – National University of Singapore, accessed July 19, 2025, https://cde.nus.edu.sg/cee/graduate/coursework-based-programmes/msc-ce/
73. Research Fellow (Structural Health Monitoring), National University of Singapore, Singapore | scholarshipdb.net, accessed July 19, 2025, http://scholarshipdb.net/jobs-in-Singapore/Research-Fellow-Structural-Health-Monitoring-National-University-Of-Singapore=cihz3wrO7hGUYwAlkGUTnw.html
74. Sofotec Singapore | Smart Cities | Fiber Optic Sensors, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.sofotec.com.sg/
75. About Us – Sofotec Singapore, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.sofotec.com.sg/about-us
76. Structural Health Monitoring – DenseLight Semiconductors, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.denselight.com/our_application/structural-health-monitoring/
77. Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) Systems – DYWIDAG, accessed July 19, 2025, https://dywidag.com/products/shm-systems
78. Light Structures AS, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.lightstructures.com/
79. Construction Structural Health Monitoring – Hexagon, accessed July 19, 2025, https://hexagon.com/solutions/structures-construction-monitoring
80. Challenges in implementation of SHM – ResearchGate, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290965199_Challenges_in_implementation_of_SHM
81. Structural Health Monitoring Companies – Market Research Future, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.marketresearchfuture.com/reports/structural-health-monitoring-market/companies

Lessons from Bridge Structural Health Monitoring (SHM) and Their Implications for the Development of Cyber-Physical Systems – MDPI, accessed July 19, 2025, https://www.mdpi.com/2412-3811/9/2/30